Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For sale: West’s deadly nuclear secrets
Times, UK ^

Posted on 01/06/2008 3:03:02 AM PST by Srirangan

A WHISTLEBLOWER has made a series of extraordinary claims about how corrupt government officials allowed Pakistan and other states to steal nuclear weapons secrets.

Sibel Edmonds, a 37-year-old former Turkish language translator for the FBI, listened into hundreds of sensitive intercepted conversations while based at the agency’s Washington field office.

She approached The Sunday Times last month after reading about an Al-Qaeda terrorist who had revealed his role in training some of the 9/11 hijackers while he was in Turkey.

Edmonds described how foreign intelligence agents had enlisted the support of US officials to acquire a network of moles in sensitive military and nuclear institutions.

Among the hours of covert tape recordings, she says she heard evidence that one well-known senior official in the US State Department was being paid by Turkish agents in Washington who were selling the information on to black market buyers, including Pakistan.

The name of the official – who has held a series of top government posts – is known to The Sunday Times. He strongly denies the claims.

However, Edmonds said: “He was aiding foreign operatives against US interests by passing them highly classified information, not only from the State Department but also from the Pentagon, in exchange for money, position and political objectives.”

She claims that the FBI was also gathering evidence against senior Pentagon officials – including household names – who were aiding foreign agents.

“If you made public all the information that the FBI have on this case, you will see very high-level people going through criminal trials,” she said.

Her story shows just how much the West was infiltrated by foreign states seeking nuclear secrets. It illustrates how western government officials turned a blind eye to, or were even helping, countries such as Pakistan acquire bomb technology.

The wider nuclear network has been monitored for many years by a joint Anglo-American intelligence effort. But rather than shut it down, investigations by law enforcement bodies such as the FBI and Britain’s Revenue & Customs have been aborted to preserve diplomatic relations.

Edmonds, a fluent speaker of Turkish and Farsi, was recruited by the FBI in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Her previous claims about incompetence inside the FBI have been well documented in America.

She has given evidence to closed sessions of Congress and the 9/11 commission, but many of the key points of her testimony have remained secret. She has now decided to divulge some of that information after becoming disillusioned with the US authorities’ failure to act.

One of Edmonds’s main roles in the FBI was to translate thousands of hours of conversations by Turkish diplomatic and political targets that had been covertly recorded by the agency.

A backlog of tapes had built up, dating back to 1997, which were needed for an FBI investigation into links between the Turks and Pakistani, Israeli and US targets. Before she left the FBI in 2002 she heard evidence that pointed to money laundering, drug imports and attempts to acquire nuclear and conventional weapons technology.

“What I found was damning,” she said. “While the FBI was investigating, several arms of the government were shielding what was going on.”

The Turks and Israelis had planted “moles” in military and academic institutions which handled nuclear technology. Edmonds says there were several transactions of nuclear material every month, with the Pakistanis being among the eventual buyers. “The network appeared to be obtaining information from every nuclear agency in the United States,” she said.

They were helped, she says, by the high-ranking State Department official who provided some of their moles – mainly PhD students – with security clearance to work in sensitive nuclear research facilities. These included the Los Alamos nuclear laboratory in New Mexico, which is responsible for the security of the US nuclear deterrent.

In one conversation Edmonds heard the official arranging to pick up a $15,000 cash bribe. The package was to be dropped off at an agreed location by someone in the Turkish diplomatic community who was working for the network.

The Turks, she says, often acted as a conduit for the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), Pakistan’s spy agency, because they were less likely to attract suspicion. Venues such as the American Turkish Council in Washington were used to drop off the cash, which was picked up by the official.

Edmonds said: “I heard at least three transactions like this over a period of 2½ years. There are almost certainly more.”

The Pakistani operation was led by General Mahmoud Ahmad, then the ISI chief.

Intercepted communications showed Ahmad and his colleagues stationed in Washington were in constant contact with attachés in the Turkish embassy.

Intelligence analysts say that members of the ISI were close to Al-Qaeda before and after 9/11. Indeed, Ahmad was accused of sanctioning a $100,000 wire payment to Mohammed Atta, one of the 9/11 hijackers, immediately before the attacks.

The results of the espionage were almost certainly passed to Abdul Qadeer Khan, the Pakistani nuclear scientist.

Khan was close to Ahmad and the ISI. While running Pakistan’s nuclear programme, he became a millionaire by selling atomic secrets to Libya, Iran and North Korea. He also used a network of companies in America and Britain to obtain components for a nuclear programme.

Khan caused an alert among western intelligence agencies when his aides met Osama Bin Laden. “We were aware of contact between A Q Khan’s people and Al-Qaeda,” a former CIA officer said last week. “There was absolute panic when we initially discovered this, but it kind of panned out in the end.”

It is likely that the nuclear secrets stolen from the United States would have been sold to a number of rogue states by Khan.

Edmonds was later to see the scope of the Pakistani connections when it was revealed that one of her fellow translators at the FBI was the daughter of a Pakistani embassy official who worked for Ahmad. The translator was given top secret clearance despite protests from FBI investigators.

Edmonds says packages containing nuclear secrets were delivered by Turkish operatives, using their cover as members of the diplomatic and military community, to contacts at the Pakistani embassy in Washington.

Following 9/11, a number of the foreign operatives were taken in for questioning by the FBI on suspicion that they knew about or somehow aided the attacks.

Edmonds said the State Department official once again proved useful. “A primary target would call the official and point to names on the list and say, ‘We need to get them out of the US because we can’t afford for them to spill the beans’,” she said. “The official said that he would ‘take care of it’.”

The four suspects on the list were released from interrogation and extradited.

Edmonds also claims that a number of senior officials in the Pentagon had helped Israeli and Turkish agents.

“The people provided lists of potential moles from Pentagon-related institutions who had access to databases concerning this information,” she said.

“The handlers, who were part of the diplomatic community, would then try to recruit those people to become moles for the network. The lists contained all their ‘hooking points’, which could be financial or sexual pressure points, their exact job in the Pentagon and what stuff they had access to.”

One of the Pentagon figures under investigation was Lawrence Franklin, a former Pentagon analyst, who was jailed in 2006 for passing US defence information to lobbyists and sharing classified information with an Israeli diplomat.

“He was one of the top people providing information and packages during 2000 and 2001,” she said.

Once acquired, the nuclear secrets could have gone anywhere. The FBI monitored Turkish diplomats who were selling copies of the information to the highest bidder.

Edmonds said: “Certain greedy Turkish operators would make copies of the material and look around for buyers. They had agents who would find potential buyers.”

In summer 2000, Edmonds says the FBI monitored one of the agents as he met two Saudi Arabian businessmen in Detroit to sell nuclear information that had been stolen from an air force base in Alabama. She overheard the agent saying: “We have a package and we’re going to sell it for $250,000.”

Edmonds’s employment with the FBI lasted for just six months. In March 2002 she was dismissed after accusing a colleague of covering up illicit activity involving Turkish nationals.

She has always claimed that she was victimised for being outspoken and was vindicated by an Office of the Inspector General review of her case three years later. It found that one of the contributory reasons for her sacking was that she had made valid complaints.

The US attorney-general has imposed a state secrets privilege order on her, which prevents her revealing more details of the FBI’s methods and current investigations.

Her allegations were heard in a closed session of Congress, but no action has been taken and she continues to campaign for a public hearing.

She was able to discuss the case with The Sunday Times because, by the end of January 2002, the justice department had shut down the programme.

The senior official in the State Department no longer works there. Last week he denied all of Edmonds’s allegations: “If you are calling me to say somebody said that I took money, that’s outrageous . . . I do not have anything to say about such stupid ridiculous things as this.”

In researching this article, The Sunday Times has talked to two FBI officers (one serving, one former) and two former CIA sources who worked on nuclear proliferation. While none was aware of specific allegations against officials she names, they did provide overlapping corroboration of Edmonds’s story.

One of the CIA sources confirmed that the Turks had acquired nuclear secrets from the United States and shared the information with Pakistan and Israel. “We have no indication that Turkey has its own nuclear ambitions. But the Turks are traders. To my knowledge they became big players in the late 1990s,” the source said.

How Pakistan got the bomb, then sold it to the highest bidders

1965 Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, Pakistan’s foreign minister, says: “If India builds the bomb we will eat grass . . . but we will get one of our own”

1974 Nuclear programme becomes increased priority as India tests a nuclear device

1976 Abdul Qadeer Khan, a scientist, steals secrets from Dutch uranium plant. Made head of his nation’s nuclear programme by Bhutto, now prime minister

1976 onwards Clandestine network established to obtain materials and technology for uranium enrichment from the West

1985 Pakistan produces weapons-grade uranium for the first time

1989-91 Khan’s network sells Iran nuclear weapons information and technology

1991-97 Khan sells weapons technology to North Korea and Libya

1998 India tests nuclear bomb and Pakistan follows with a series of nuclear tests. Khan says: “I never had any doubts I was building a bomb. We had to do it”

2001 CIA chief George Tenet gathers officials for crisis summit on the proliferation of nuclear technology from Pakistan to other countries

2001 Weeks before 9/11, Khan’s aides meet Osama Bin Laden to discuss an Al-Qaeda nuclear device

2001 After 9/11 proliferation crisis becomes secondary as Pakistan is seen as important ally in war on terror

2003 Libya abandons nuclear weapons programme and admits acquiring components through Pakistani nuclear scientists

2004 Khan placed under house arrest and confesses to supplying Iran, Libya and North Korea with weapons technology. He is pardoned by President Pervez Musharraf

2006 North Korea tests a nuclear bomb

2007 Renewed fears that bomb may fall into hands of Islamic extremists as killing of Benazir Bhutto throws country into turmoil


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: nuclear; nuclearblackmarket; proliferation; wmd

1 posted on 01/06/2008 3:03:05 AM PST by Srirangan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Srirangan

Why should Billary be the only one to profit ...


2 posted on 01/06/2008 3:08:40 AM PST by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Srirangan
To my knowledge they became big players in the late 1990s,”

It helps if you have an utterly corrupt American administration in power to help things along.

3 posted on 01/06/2008 3:13:11 AM PST by denydenydeny (Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Srirangan
Big deal.. Clinton sold off everything to the ChiComs and Ryadi. Whats left?
4 posted on 01/06/2008 3:33:17 AM PST by AlexW (Reporting from Bratislava, Slovakia. Happy not to be back in the USA for now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

This is only the tip of the iceburg. It will go MUCH deeper as time goes on. Lazer tech, antigrav, spacetime, materials transformation and on and on.


5 posted on 01/06/2008 4:09:23 AM PST by P8triot1 (Liberalism ALWAYS produces the exact opposite of its stated intent. Quinns 1st. law..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Srirangan

Beyond Treason . . . . ‘Nuff said.


6 posted on 01/06/2008 4:12:40 AM PST by ex-Texan (Matthew 7: 1 - 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Srirangan

This information will not get wide dissemination in the States - the driveby media will ignore this information as best they can to protect their sources in the State Department and DOD.


7 posted on 01/06/2008 4:19:00 AM PST by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Srirangan
This isn't in "Google News", or in any other US newspaper!

I believe Sibel Edmonds and, btw, Farsi is the predominant language of Iran. :(

8 posted on 01/06/2008 4:20:12 AM PST by Does so (...against all enemies, DOMESTIC and foreign...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer

What do you mean?


9 posted on 01/06/2008 4:28:09 AM PST by Srirangan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

I wonder how nuch of this information was up close and personal to Sandy Burglars socks?


10 posted on 01/06/2008 5:04:58 AM PST by CTyank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Srirangan

It’s telling that this American whistleblower isn’t going to an American paper.

Despite all the 1970’s films and novels where the MSM is the first port-of-call for heroic whistleblowers of eevil Government conspiracies - the heroine in this case goes to a British paper.

Will the stark reality of the politically corrupt media ever find its way into a mainstream thriller? I doubt it.


11 posted on 01/06/2008 6:16:23 AM PST by agere_contra (Do not confuse the wealth of nations with the wealth of government - FDT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Beyond Treason . . . . ‘Nuff said.

If they catch these guys, I say give 'em a speedy trial and then publicly execute them on the steps of the US Capital as a warning to all wanna-be espionage agents so that they fully comprehend the consequences of their actions. Yes, I know this is wishful thinking, but until we get serious about these anti-American weasels in the State Department and the Pentagon and make them pay for their actions this is going to continue until they destroy the country from within. The very existence of the nation is at stake here.....

12 posted on 01/06/2008 6:20:52 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Debates? Those weren't no stinkin' debates!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Srirangan
I dunno, the story strains credulity. She worked for the FBI for six months and was fired. There are a lot of people with vivid imaginations who can weave a Himalaya of conspiracy out of a molehill of fact and few tons of conjecture.

I could be wrong, but is sounds like bs to me.

13 posted on 01/06/2008 6:39:17 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Being an idealist excuses nothing. Hitler was an idealist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Srirangan

btt


14 posted on 01/06/2008 12:03:32 PM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Srirangan

Although not explicitly a part of this particular story you must admit that Billary receiving huge amounts of Chinese cash after our W88 secrets , our targeting secrets , our rocket propulsion secrets and our submerged launch secrets went awol in the 1990’s is not a coincidence.. she’s still getting large donations...


15 posted on 01/06/2008 12:39:33 PM PST by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Srirangan; Fedora; piasa; ravingnutter

Most interesting..... Plamegate had a Turkish angle, fwiw..... Joe and Valerie first met at a reception given by the Turkish Ambassador in DC, Joe Wilson had financial connections with Turkish interests, etc. I wonder just how much US security has been compromised by State Dept. and CIA traitors and weasels helping to sell and give away US secrets and interests???


16 posted on 01/06/2008 1:08:20 PM PST by Enchante (Democrat terror-fighting motto: "BLEAT - CHEAT - RETREAT - DEFEAT - REPEAT")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Srirangan

bttt


17 posted on 01/07/2008 12:07:46 AM PST by AnimalLover ( ((Are there special rules and regulations for the big guys?)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer

You got it.


18 posted on 01/07/2008 11:13:10 AM PST by quant5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Enchante; piasa; the Real fifi

Thanks. As you may recall, Edmonds previously made related allegations relevant to the Turkish angle of Plamegate, which I touched on in one of my posts on that. Not sure what to make of her claims, could be true but Edmonds has some credibility issues due to the company she keeps IMO—VIPS and such—so I’m still awaiting substantiation or disconfirmation at this point.


19 posted on 01/07/2008 3:54:03 PM PST by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson