Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kurt Evans

Chuck: Look up Federalism in the Funk & Wagnalls dictionary...I’ll wait....


3 posted on 01/13/2008 10:57:01 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet; Kurt Evans
Chuck: Look up Federalism in the Funk & Wagnalls dictionary...I’ll wait....

Bill Gates owns Funk & Wagnall. That was the basis for Encarta.

7 posted on 01/13/2008 11:03:06 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
With all due respect for Mr. Norris, I’d say he needs to listen to conservatives from Arkansas and take a good long look at Huckabee’s legacy rather than relying on Huckabee’s own version of the facts.

The “Shiites” of Arkansas, as Huckabee called state conservatives, know the real Mike Huckabee. We would all do well to heed their warnings.

.....................................

http://www.arkansasnews.com/archive/2008/01/09/DavidJSanders/344761.html

"In 2000, Huckabee insisted on controlling the state party’s separate Victory Committee, but the committee’s finances were so poorly handled that a Federal Election Commission investigation resulted in the largest fine ever handed down by the FEC to a state party. That same year Republican Rep. Jay Dickey lost the 4th District seat he’d held for eight years.

In 2001, when conservative Republican lawmakers opposed a higher sales taxes and fees the governor supported, he began calling them “Shiites.” Huckabee’s positions on fiscal policy became indistinguishable from Democrats’ positions. A year later, he openly campaigned against a ballot initiative to remove the sales tax on food and medicine. While he and Rockefeller won re-election in 2002, Sen. Tim Hutchinson didn’t.

In 2003, Huckabee not only begged lawmakers for new taxes to make up a budget shortfall, but he rebuffed conservatives’ (Republicans and a couple of Democrats) plan to cover the shortfall by tapping one-time money and cutting pork. In 2004, President Bush won re-election, but Huckabee campaigned for some Democrats - even some who had Republican opponents - and Republicans lost state legislative seats for the first time since 1990.

In 2005, a term-limited Huckabee frustrated conservatives when he pushed a bill to give in-state college tuition and scholarships to the children of illegal immigrants. The next year, Democrats swept Republicans in every race for statewide constitutional office and Republicans lost legislative seats for the second consecutive election cycle.

Shortly after becoming governor in 1996, one of Huckabee’s top aides predicted that his boss would do for Arkansas what Gov. Carroll Campbell did for South Carolina, meaning that Arkansas would cast aside its Democratic past and whole-heartedly embrace Republicanism by the time he left office.

Yeah ? that didn’t happen."

11 posted on 01/13/2008 11:11:00 PM PST by Route66 (America's Main Street - - - Fred D. Thompson / Consistent Conservative...The One with Gravitas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Chuck: Look up Federalism in the Funk & Wagnalls dictionary...”

For the record, Senator Thompson’s weakness on the right to life is about much more than federalism. Even if Roe v. Wade is overturned, he’s said consistently since 1994 that he wouldn’t support state laws to prohibit abortion. During his 1994 campaign he said, “I’m not willing to support laws that prohibit early-term abortions.” He told Project Vote Smart, “Abortions should be legal in all circumstances as long as the procedure is completed within the first trimester of the pregnancy.” He explicitly refused to support laws prohibiting abortions for convenience:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=P5a_Fpu_8KE

In 1996 he signed a document saying, “I do not believe abortion should be criminalized.” He still personally opposes laws to prohibit abortion:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=F1tfGh3ITCc
http://youtube.com/watch?v=kTQxoXD-scw
http://youtube.com/watch?v=H-b1xQNRA4g

Here’s a quote from that November 7 conversation with Tim Russert:

“When I saw—and again, ALL CONSISTENT WITH WHAT I’VE SAID [emphasis mine]. I—people ask me hypothetically, you know, OK, it goes back to the states. Somebody comes up with a bill, and they say we’re going to outlaw this, that or the other. And my response was I do not think it is a wise thing to criminalize young girls and perhaps their parents as aiders and abettors or perhaps their family physician... I do not think that you can have a, a, a law that would be effective and that would be the right thing to do ...”


27 posted on 01/13/2008 11:24:45 PM PST by Kurt Evans (This message not approved by any candidate or candidate's committee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Wow, his criticisms of Fred are demonstratively weak. Poor Huck.


114 posted on 01/14/2008 6:27:54 AM PST by rintense (Thompson / Hunter 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson