[Rurudyne]

Landru, I don't disagree with your assessment of the Clintons at all.

I only think they didn't knowingly help 9/11 to happen and pointed to how some of them actually commented that if it had happened earlier than President Clinton, rather than President Bush, would have had a chance to strut his stuff.

Of course, I would dispute (and I'd think you'd agree) that President Clinton would have had any "stuff" to strut at all. He would have handled the whole thing like he did the earlier WTC attack (among others).

Did you ever see the editorial cartoon where a man and woman were in bed and the woman says: "Thank God for President Bush!" to which the man responds: "Shut up, Tipper!"

[Landru]

"Landru, I don't disagree with your assessment of the Clintons at all."

Thank god.
The Clintigula subject hits my hot button like no other.
(~you couldn't tell, huh. {g})

"I only think they didn't knowingly help 9/11 to happen and pointed to how some of them actually commented that if it had happened earlier than President Clinton, rather than President Bush, would have had a chance to strut his stuff."

Fair enough, FWIW we were at 60Hz on [that] point all along.
I just never considered --a'tall-- their possible complicity, until it was mentioned.
Then the plausibility hit me given who they really are.

"Of course, I would dispute (and I'd think you'd agree) that President Clinton would have had any "stuff" to strut at all."

Not much *strut*; but, plenty of DNA. ;^)

"He would have handled the whole thing like he did the earlier WTC attack (among others)."

Non-handling, the Carter Method.

"Did you ever see the editorial cartoon where a man and woman were in bed and the woman says: "Thank God for President Bush!" to which the man responds: "Shut up, Tipper!""

HA!!
No, I don't believe I did.
But as Rush likes to point out, a[ny] successful parody *must* have one component to really work.

...a nugget of truth. :^)