To: the invisib1e hand
Adding to the suspicion is that the UNSUCCESSFUL 1993 attack, which was also due to Democrat incompetence or treason, happened While the Clintons Were In Office. Could this have been a set-up for the 2001 attack, to throw suspicion off them?
9 posted on
02/09/2008 11:43:56 PM PST by
FFranco
To: FFranco
sort of seems like a stretch; remember, we're dealing with pre-renaissence mentality. if they could have brought in enough firecrackers, they would have probably tried that.
However, the lull of domestic activity between then and 2001 was of note.
10 posted on
02/09/2008 11:48:34 PM PST by
the invisib1e hand
(anyone can be a soldier in peacetime.)
To: FFranco
The first attack came close to success. Furthermore, the towers had a lot more people in them in 1993. If One had come down, more people would have been killed than on 9/11.
100 posted on
02/10/2008 3:47:39 PM PST by
RobbyS
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson