Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the invisib1e hand

Adding to the suspicion is that the UNSUCCESSFUL 1993 attack, which was also due to Democrat incompetence or treason, happened While the Clintons Were In Office. Could this have been a set-up for the 2001 attack, to throw suspicion off them?


9 posted on 02/09/2008 11:43:56 PM PST by FFranco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: FFranco
sort of seems like a stretch; remember, we're dealing with pre-renaissence mentality. if they could have brought in enough firecrackers, they would have probably tried that.

However, the lull of domestic activity between then and 2001 was of note.

10 posted on 02/09/2008 11:48:34 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (anyone can be a soldier in peacetime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: FFranco

The first attack came close to success. Furthermore, the towers had a lot more people in them in 1993. If One had come down, more people would have been killed than on 9/11.


100 posted on 02/10/2008 3:47:39 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson