Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Arthur McGowan
Indicating that the bishops have been systematically selected from among the worst priests, not the best.
How are Bishops selected? Who chooses and how?
21 posted on 02/12/2008 7:22:10 PM PST by narses (...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: narses

In general, they are recommended by those who are already bishops. As documented in Randy Engel’s book, The Rite of Sodomy, many bishops have been recommended by the bishops they were sleeping with.

The worst bishops in the U.S. (Bernardin, Wuerl, Niederauer, Ryan, Law, Mugavero, Cushing, Untener, McCarrick, etc., etc.) can be traced back, step-by-step, to Abp. O’Connell of Boston and Cardinal Spellman of New York. Both notorious gay bishops. They created a kind of hierarchy within the hierarchy. Engel lays out a kind of gay genealogy. Almost every bishop who has actually been caught in some kind of sexual scandal, and the worst of the enablers, are part of this group. (There have been plenty of corrupt, enabling bishops who aren’t part of this gay family tree, also.)

This is why these bishops are so malleable in the hands of the Church’s enemies. You don’t think that the pro-aborts who march up to receive Communion from “Donna” Wuerl don’t know all about him? And that he doesn’t know that they have the power (and the information) to destroy him, if he makes the mistake of becoming a Catholic?


38 posted on 02/13/2008 10:01:07 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson