Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon to shoot down broken spy satellite
AP ^ | 02-14-2008 | AP

Posted on 02/14/2008 9:07:45 AM PST by montag813

WASHINGTON - U.S. officials say the Pentagon is planning to shoot down a broken spy satellite expected to hit the Earth in early March.

This is the U.S. military will use a missile to destroy a satellite in space, NBC News reports.

The spy satellite has lost all power and is expected to crash back on earth in early March, spreading debris and potentially hazardous fuel over several hundred miles.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aegis; bmd; dod; interceptor; lockheed; missile; missiledefense; nasa; pentagon; raytheon; satellite; sm3; usn; usnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-142 next last
Modified SM-3 missiles will be used from a destroyer and cruiser in the Pacific.
1 posted on 02/14/2008 9:07:46 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: montag813

Should be a good test.


2 posted on 02/14/2008 9:09:18 AM PST by PlanoMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Didn’t we get all perturbed because the Chinese shot a sattelite in orbit and created a lot of space junk?


3 posted on 02/14/2008 9:09:47 AM PST by saganite (Lust type what you what in the “tagline” space)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Won’t this cause a debris cloud similar to the one the Chinese created, endangering the space station, etc.?


4 posted on 02/14/2008 9:10:03 AM PST by Brian S. Fitzgerald ("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Right out of a Tom Clancy novel.


5 posted on 02/14/2008 9:10:22 AM PST by L,TOWM (Liberals, The Other White Meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L,TOWM
I guess the Chinese can say now their reasons for doing the same thing were just as valid.
6 posted on 02/14/2008 9:11:30 AM PST by Brian S. Fitzgerald ("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: montag813
If the intercept is successful and the satellite blown to bits, it appears most of the debris will become orbitting "space junk" and not re-enter the earth's atmopshere.

Just more junk to keep track of now... it's getting pretty messy up there.

7 posted on 02/14/2008 9:12:24 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Cool. When?


8 posted on 02/14/2008 9:13:22 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

They might chunk it, but a call to Beijing would result in the advise that blowing up a satellite doesn’t bring it down but results in thousands of smaller satellites.


9 posted on 02/14/2008 9:13:33 AM PST by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Earlier article:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22857051/

"...The U.S. military has no weapon designed to shoot down a satellite, but it demonstrated the ability to do that in the mid-1980s, and could cobble together a plan to do so again fairly quickly, said the senior defense official.

Such a move appears unlikely, given global dismay about China’s use of a missile to destroy a much bigger satellite at a higher orbit, which scattered nearly 1,000 pieces of debris throughout space, the official said..."

10 posted on 02/14/2008 9:13:55 AM PST by Brian S. Fitzgerald ("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S. Fitzgerald

Near-Earth orbit spy satellite. Debris should enter atmosphere and burn up shortly after destruction. Space Center is further out in space.

OTOH, I’d scream with laughter if they “accidently” took out an communist spy-sat.

Memo to Putin: Ooops, my bad
Signed: Dubya


11 posted on 02/14/2008 9:13:55 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: saganite
Didn’t we get all perturbed because the Chinese shot a sattelite in orbit and created a lot of space junk?

Yeah, but come on, they're Chinese...

12 posted on 02/14/2008 9:13:58 AM PST by Living Free in NH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

But the space shuttle still has to fly through that altitude range.


13 posted on 02/14/2008 9:15:05 AM PST by Brian S. Fitzgerald ("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brian S. Fitzgerald

“I guess the Chinese can say now their reasons for doing the same thing were just as valid.”

As if they care about “valid” reasons for anything they do....


14 posted on 02/14/2008 9:15:37 AM PST by Rb ver. 2.0 (Global warming is the new Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: montag813
---spreading debris and potentially hazardous fuel over several hundred miles.--

--I can't believe the fuel was going to survive re-entry or that it was going to be that hazardous--so now we are going to spread junk over multiples of millions of cubic miles of space just as the Chinese did??

15 posted on 02/14/2008 9:16:12 AM PST by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Modified SM-3 missiles will be used from a destroyer and cruiser in the Pacific.

Wow, looks like I actually guessed correctly at the likely weapons system.

16 posted on 02/14/2008 9:17:21 AM PST by Charles Martel (The Tree of Liberty thirsts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

there must be some other reason for doing this - maybe the Russians have the capability to grab it.


17 posted on 02/14/2008 9:17:56 AM PST by Brian S. Fitzgerald ("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: saganite

different orbit, no?

And that said, who cares?


18 posted on 02/14/2008 9:18:48 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Mossad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: montag813

I think this is also a “heads up” to China, Russia, NK and Iran as well.


19 posted on 02/14/2008 9:20:48 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S. Fitzgerald

“there must be some other reason for doing this - maybe the Russians have the capability to grab it.”

Or the debri field will cross paths with a few chinese or ruski satellites on the way down.


20 posted on 02/14/2008 9:22:12 AM PST by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson