Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TinaJeannes
I agree with you. That would mean every child not born in the 48 Contiguous States or Alaska or Hawaii, is now not considered a natural born citizen. So, children of military members born overseas are not natural born citizens ... yet Mexican children born in the US would be (having dual citizenship).

I think not. The courts would throw it out, even a Clinton appointee. That would throw into doubt thousands (maybe hundreds of thousands) of children and adults now residing in the states or elsewhere, not just McCain. That would be a political death-keel to the Dems.
14 posted on 02/16/2008 8:51:07 PM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: K-oneTexas
Current State Department policy reads: "Despite widespread popular belief, U.S. military installations abroad and U.S. diplomatic or consular facilities are not part of the United States within the meaning of the 14th Amendment. A child born on the premises of such a facility is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and does not acquire U.S. citizenship by reason of birth."

interesting

16 posted on 02/16/2008 8:56:57 PM PST by icwhatudo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas

Don’t forget everyone born in Alaska and Hawaii prior to their entries in 1959.


24 posted on 02/16/2008 9:04:25 PM PST by VanShuyten ("Ah! but it was something to have at least a choice of nightmares.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas

Your darn right it would


33 posted on 02/16/2008 9:31:17 PM PST by TinaJeannes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson