I urge Republicans to vote for Hillary on March 4

2/20/08 | me, blatant vanity

[Caipirabob]

DON'T DO THIS!!!

We want her OUT ASAP!

This is insanity. Obama is a much more preferable oponent in the GE come November. Hillary has had YEARS to build her machine and will win easily due to fraud. It remains a question if any democrats will go through that effort on such a scale for a black man. Remember that the DNC is the party of instituted racism. Obama is far weaker in the general election.

GET RID OF HER NOW!

This is the team Hillary has assembled:

This is the team Obama has assembled:

Throw the water on the witch while there's still time!

[squidly]

I think that you’re exactly the freeper I’m trying to speak to. Don’t overestimate her. She is dirty and scoundrelous, but she is not omnipotent. As is evidenced by Obama’s recent wins, she can be beaten. Don’t give her more credit than she deserves.

[alnick]

I’m going to have an evil free November. How about you?

I was where you are -- could not bring myself to vote for McCain in November -- until I realized that on one issue, he is different from any democrat. He is against partial birth abortion.

My conscience cannot allow me to not vote for the one candidate who will fight brutal infanticide.

I completely understand the unwillingness to pull the lever for John McCain. I will be holding my nose.

[DoughtyOne]

That bottom graphic is priceless! Loved it.

[alnick]

Great tag line. :-)

[Kimberly GG]

Personally, I don’t believe Obama can or will be beaten.

We’ve made our bed. Let’s just hope it is the Rx needed to unite and rid the party of RHINOs.

[DoughtyOne]

I fear that John is the consumate globalist. By the time the U.N. is through working on globalists, that issue will be amute point.

It’s going to be approached as a crime against humanity, if you object to abortion.

Many people still see this as a woman’s rights issue.

I am sympathetic to your views on this, but parceling off our sovereignty will not achive your goal here. And that is the globalist plan, pure and simple.

[djf]

It’s plain wrong to do something like this.
There have been times in Washington state where the dems have crossed over in an organized fashion to vote for some people on the right who were kinda looney tunes.

And good, respectable Republican candidates were washed out and defeated over it, and of course the Dem won the election.

Dirty politics stinks no matter which side of the aisle it comes from.

[alnick]

I'm talking specifically about partial birth abortion. I cannot directly or indirectly support that. With all other things being equal, it's now down to one issue for me.

I'm generally not a one-issue voter, but that's what it took to make me even want to vote this November. Well, there is one other issue. McCain does support the WOT. That's another important issue to me.

As I said, I do understand and respect any conservative and/or republican's decision to withhold his vote from McCain.

[squidly]

I hear what you’re saying, but we aren’t defeating any conservatives by voting for Hillary. McCain already has the Republican nomination wrapped up (not saying he’s a conservative). It’s a question of whether we’d rather face Hillary or Obama in November. I’d rather face Hillary. She’s beatable. I’m uncertain whether Obama’s messianic tinge will wear off before then or not.

[Bob J]

I like the way you think.

[incindiary]

"Both of them are anxious to hurtle us toward socialism. ..... Both of them must be defeated at the ballot box."

Yes, I know that politics-wise they are both dangerous. I know that they are both socialists. But character-wise, if you compare the two, The Clintons have a long record of criminal activities. They have a long list of dead former associates - including high ranking government officials (Vince Foster, Ron Brown) and people who had dirt on them. They have a long sordid list of serious scandals, including gassing and burning US citizens (Waco), political firings, abuse of power, illegal and treasonous political contributions, numerous convictions of Clinton friends and appointees, numerous investigations, corruption coming out the ying-yang, wag-the-dog bombings, I could go on and on.

Does Obama have a long history of criminal activity? If he did, we would know it by now. Does Obama have a list of dead former colleagues? I don't think so. Does Obama have a long list of scandals and a known disregard for the law? Does Obama have a long history of proven lies? Not that I know of, and if he does, it's not even in the ballpark of the Clintons.

As I've said on other threads, I don't think we've seen the worst of the Clintons. They are ruthless and capable of anything, and the LAST thing we need is a Clinton third term. That would be one more chance for them to destroy this country and bring us their ultimate goal, a global socialist (tyrannical) government. As was stated on this thread, Clinton's mentor, Carrol Quigley openly admitted the goal of the globalists. Don't think they won't try if they get back in power. I'm not saying Obama is not also a socialist-globalist... but although I'm not voting for ANY of the front-runner candidates, I'd rather have an inexperienced, young Obama than the evil, criminal ruthless Clintons back in power to finish what they didn't the first time around.

[incindiary]

"McCain does support the WOT."

If McCain truly supported the "war on terror", he wouldn't have such blatant disregard for our open borders. And he wouldn't be siding with the KLA, a group of drug-running terrorists.

Don't be so fooled by his talk. He's a typical politician.

[prov1813man]

No. Stopped now and forever by any means necessary, regardless.

[AdvisorB]

You are, as usual, right on target.

When I think of Hillary I think of the comment by Ash in Aliens (circa 1979)...

"You still don't know what you're dealing with do you? Perfect organism. Its structural perfection is matched only by its hostility [...] I admire its purity, a survivor; unclouded by conscience, remorse or delusions of morality." - Ash

[Smile-n-Win]

She is dirty and scoundrelous, but she is not omnipotent. As is evidenced by Obama’s recent wins, she can be beaten.

Exactly. It is not some kind of powerful machine (Clinton or whatever else) that America is primarily threatened by, but the ignorance and emotionalism of the voters. The latter is going to bring ruin to America regardless of whether it does it through a bitch named Hillary or a charlatan called Hussein.

I am open to debate on whether we should prefer Hillary or Queeg in the general, but I'm quite convinced that as far as the Rat primary is concerned, we should very definitely prefer the lesser evil, the old bitch that much of America already hates: Hillary.

[BruceS]

I am in Ohio and, if I remember correctly, you get to ask for any party’s ballot in the first primary in which you vote after registering. From then on, you have to vote in that party’s primary, unless you re-registere.

[steveyp]

Socialist is a charitable description of Obama. I’d like Hillary to stay in till the convention as well simply because the longer she stays in the more money both of these bozos raise and spend. I’d like the brokered convention, disheartened and disillusioned donors, and Hillary losing at the convention. I want her and Bill to keep hope alive for as long as possible.

[tailgunner]

Better the Devil we know (Hillary) than the Devils we don’t know (Obama) and the unstable, ill-tempered loose canon (McCain) Write down my name for Hillary, the closest candidate to conservative that we gonna git.

[Hardastarboard]

Pointless and unethical.

Just like the previous, and possibly future, Clinton administration(s).