Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sharjah shops told to 'behead' mannequins
Gulf News ^ | 02/20/2008 | Mariam M. Al Serkal

Posted on 02/20/2008 2:45:30 PM PST by forkinsocket

Sharjah: Mannequins in Sharjah shops should be headless and only model “decent” clothing, a Sharjah Municipality circular has stated.

The municipality has urged shopkeepers to abide by a ban that prohibits the display of mannequins with facial features, said a senior Sharjah Municipality official.

“The only clothes on display now should be decent and the mannequins should be headless,” said Khalid Al Jaberi, head of market control at Sharjah Municipality.

A circular was recently sent to all shops stating the heads of mannequins be removed and that they are forbidden to wear underwear, to uphold the traditional and religious values of the emirate.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“We reinforced the ban because it was a religious issue that raised many complaints from residents, who were against shops displaying men and women’s undergarments on realistic mannequins,” said Al Jaberi.

He said no fines had been imposed on shops because everyone had adhered to the circular. Sharjah Municipality originally implemented the ban five years ago following a fatwa issued by the Islamic Affairs Department.

However, the ban has been reinforced because several outlets had stopped abiding by the rule. The municipality has always been keen on conserving the traditional Islamic values of Sharjah and has already implemented several rules, including the ban on men selling women’s undergarments in shops.

The Sharjah Economic Development Department ordered 10 shops to close in March 2007 for flouting the rule, and instructed all shops and shopping centres to hire only female employees to sell women’s undergarments.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: emirates; islam; mannequins; sharjah
.
1 posted on 02/20/2008 2:45:31 PM PST by forkinsocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

Extremist muslins should be headless and only appear in descent.


2 posted on 02/20/2008 2:49:58 PM PST by The Iceman Cometh (Evil has a name and it is Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

These people would be amusing if they weren’t so dangerous.


3 posted on 02/20/2008 2:52:07 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

I understand the prohibition on faces from the religion, but in the name of decency, shouldn’t the mannequins wear underwear? Or does Islam forbid underwear?


4 posted on 02/20/2008 3:01:58 PM PST by tbw2 (Science fiction with real science - "Humanity's Edge" - on amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tbw2
I’ve never checked a mannequin for underware. I rarely see them beheaded as well so who knows...
5 posted on 02/20/2008 3:04:08 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

“instructed all shops and shopping centres to hire only female employees to sell women’s undergarments.”
I see other problems. If a woman cannot be seen unaccompanied by a male relative, will the stores have to hire the woman’s husband or father also?


6 posted on 02/20/2008 3:04:35 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

Sdrawkcab people.


7 posted on 02/20/2008 3:05:21 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

How on earth are they supposed to display the latest fashion in full head scarfs?


8 posted on 02/20/2008 3:06:12 PM PST by southernerwithanattitude ({new and improved redneck})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

Time for small pox?


9 posted on 02/20/2008 3:09:08 PM PST by ronnie raygun (Id rather be hunting with dick than driving with ted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbw2
"Or does Islam forbid underwear?"

I don't know...I consulted "Ask the Imam" regarding the propriety of underwear and could only find this.

These are truly some disturbed people.

10 posted on 02/20/2008 3:09:10 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

The logic is appalling. Allah forbid full facial nudity, but a woman has to wear a burqa but can’t wear underwear underneath?


11 posted on 02/20/2008 3:10:36 PM PST by tbw2 (Science fiction with real science - "Humanity's Edge" - on amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

Stuck in the Seventh Century for over 1400 years. No wonder these automatons are predictable...they’ve had lots of practice at suppression, subjugation, and socialized stupidity.


12 posted on 02/20/2008 3:20:57 PM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forkinsocket

This was also long a custom in Eastern European Orthodox Jewish communities.

Jewish hat makers had a heck of a time of that.


13 posted on 02/20/2008 3:33:23 PM PST by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson