Skip to comments.
Small Vendors Feel Pinch of Clinton’s Money Troubles
NY Times ^
| 2/23/08
| MICHAEL LUO
Posted on 02/23/2008 3:53:31 PM PST by Libloather
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
It was just $2,492.63
Hillary should put it on a credit card.
To: Libloather
Comeon...this is New Yawk fur chrissake....that was a campaign donation......
2
posted on
02/23/2008 3:57:01 PM PST
by
mo
To: Libloather
Chalk it up as political contribution, Hillary has.
yitbos
3
posted on
02/23/2008 3:57:29 PM PST
by
bruinbirdman
("Those who control language control minds. - Ayn Rand")
To: Libloather
When you walk with dogs and do business with dogs, one should not be surprised to come down with fleas:-()
4
posted on
02/23/2008 3:58:10 PM PST
by
geo40xyz
((McCain, Obama or Hillarybeast possibility of 4 Supreme Court Justices, Gore @UN. The WINNER is?))
To: Libloather
Fascinating! The NY Times actually publishes a story with a named source?!
Could this be a new trend?!
5
posted on
02/23/2008 3:58:11 PM PST
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Libloather
Dems should pay cash up front.
To: Libloather
And she wants to manage the biggest economy on earth??
Pray for W and Our Victorious Troops
7
posted on
02/23/2008 4:02:29 PM PST
by
bray
(Go InSain)
To: Libloather
The business owner in question is supposedly a Republican who doesn’t like McCain “because he is too much like Bush.” So he trusts the Clintons? What is it with New Yorkers?
8
posted on
02/23/2008 4:03:00 PM PST
by
TenthAmendmentChampion
(Global warming is to Revelations as the theory of evolution is to Genesis.)
To: Libloather
The Clintons don’t carry credit cards. Their word is good enough.
/s
9
posted on
02/23/2008 4:04:49 PM PST
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: Libloather
Typical Clintoons act.
Anyone that they touch gets bitten (or worse!!!).
To: Southack
No new trend. They require a named source ONLY for Dems. When running a hit-piece on a Republican, you only need an unnamed source to say someone they know, who will remain anonymous, heard it from someone else, who overheard a drunk guy in a bar say he read it on a blog somewhere.
11
posted on
02/23/2008 4:06:01 PM PST
by
Henchster
(Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
To: Libloather
I love how the Times couldn’t resist putting in that the business owner is a Republican that supports Hillary; they get to dog on Obama, Bush and McCain, plus satisfy their liberal readers that this is just a Republican dirty trick.
12
posted on
02/23/2008 4:06:37 PM PST
by
kingu
(Party for rent - conservative opinions not required.)
To: Libloather
[After. . . The New York Times contacted the Clinton campaign on Friday, Howard Wolfson . . .said a check to pay Mr. Semetis had been put through the day before, and he furnished a copy of the check, dated Feb. 21, as proof.]
No surprise Wolfson and Clinton’s other longtime associates are looting campaign coffers for millions. From a previous Times story:
“Mark Penn, Mrs. Clintons chief strategist and pollster, and his team collected $3.8 million for fees and expenses in January; in total, including what the campaign still owes, the firm has billed more than $10 million for consulting, direct mail and other services, an amount other Democratic strategists who are not affiliated with either campaign called stunning.”
“Howard Wolfson, the communications director and a senior member of the advertising team, earned nearly $267,000 in January. His total, including the campaigns debt to him, tops $730,000.”
“The advertising firm owned by Mandy Grunwald, the longtime media strategist for both Mrs. Clinton and Bill Clinton, the former president, has collected $2.3 million in fees and expenses, and is still owed another $240,000.”
13
posted on
02/23/2008 4:09:02 PM PST
by
Brad from Tennessee
("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
To: Libloather
Small Vendors Feel Pinch of Clinton's Money Troubles" Mis apuros son sus apuros.
14
posted on
02/23/2008 4:10:04 PM PST
by
Steely Tom
(Steely's First Law of the Main Stream Media: if it doesn't advance the agenda, it's not news.)
To: Libloather
Would you give credit to a Clinton? We know libs are stupid, but that takes the cake....
15
posted on
02/23/2008 4:10:57 PM PST
by
EagleUSA
To: Libloather
Put some ice on it Mr. Semetis.
16
posted on
02/23/2008 4:11:14 PM PST
by
SpaceBar
To: Libloather
Once trailer trash, always trailer trash.
17
posted on
02/23/2008 4:12:42 PM PST
by
alice_in_bubbaland
(Vote Obillary! And we'll be picking shrapnel out of our butts for decades!)
To: Southack
Fascinating! The NY Times actually publishes a story with a named source?!
Could this be a new trend?!
____________________________
Snicker. Named sources and fact checking only apply when attacking Democrats.
18
posted on
02/23/2008 4:12:49 PM PST
by
Greg F
(Do you want a guy named Hussein to fix your soul? Michelle Obama thinks you do.)
To: EagleUSA
“We know libs are stupid, but that takes the cake....”
Actually I think they were sandwiches.
To: Southack
Fascinating! The NY Times actually publishes a story with a named source?! It is attacking Hillary. Any attack on Non-Obama will do, now.
20
posted on
02/23/2008 4:16:13 PM PST
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson