Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Losing steam: US Navy carriers go electric (railgun catapult)
Jane's ^ | 02/27/08 | Rebecca Christie

Posted on 02/29/2008 5:35:53 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster

Losing steam: US Navy carriers go electric

By Rebecca Christie

27 February 2008

Half a century after the introduction of steam-driven catapults, the US Navy (USN) aircraft carrier community is entering an era that trades steam and hydraulics for advanced electronic circuitry.

Construction of the first in a new line of carriers, Gerald R Ford (CVN 78), is due to begin in 2008 and the USD10.5 billion ship will use electricity instead of steam for launching combat aircraft, cooking meals and heating sailors' living quarters. Its nuclear reactors will produce more electricity than any other warship, powering a maintenance revolution as well as one of the navy's 'floating cities'.

The CVN 78-class carriers - the fruit of the CVN 21 design and development programme - will have powerful new radar, upgraded landing systems and larger flight decks than their Nimitz-class predecessors. The ship's company plus air wing will number a relatively meagre 4,660 personnel, between 1,000 and 1,200 fewer than the total required in the older carriers.

Many technological advances contribute to the manpower efficiency gain. For example, radars in the new ship will not need to rotate, dramatically reducing wear and tear; and the USN says its new electromagnetic launch system can be operated by about 90 sailors, compared to the 120 needed for steam-driven catapults. Pilots on take-off may reap the most noticeable benefits as the new catapult will push them smoothly aloft, in contrast to the steam-driven jolt of the existing carriers.

(Excerpt) Read more at janes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: carrier; catapult; emals; energy; navair; navy; usn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last

1 posted on 02/29/2008 5:35:55 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I guess my big rubber band idea was shelved.


2 posted on 02/29/2008 5:40:07 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (I voted Republican because no Conservatives were running.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Why in heavens name are we naming a CVN after Ford???? And no, a SSN named after Carter doesn’t justify it.

CVN’s are capital ships. If they are to be named after men, then they should be truly great men. Franklin, Madison, Adams, Reagan, Ike, etc.

And oh yea, the rail gun catapult is great. I used to ride the old non-progressive one’s. That was a real jolt.

3 posted on 02/29/2008 5:44:49 AM PST by SampleMan (We are a free and industrious people, socialist nannies do not become us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Can they shoot at stuff when they aren't launching planes?
4 posted on 02/29/2008 5:45:18 AM PST by Camel Joe (liberal=socialist=royalist/imperialist pawn=enemy of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

Building on my last post:

Given the current war we’re in, we should name a CVN “Charles Martel” or “Roland”. That would shake the muzzies up.


5 posted on 02/29/2008 5:46:55 AM PST by SampleMan (We are a free and industrious people, socialist nannies do not become us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Electra Glide in Blue.


6 posted on 02/29/2008 5:48:50 AM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Can Navy cooks be trusted with nuclear power?


7 posted on 02/29/2008 5:52:08 AM PST by shove_it (and have a nice day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

The new catapult works on the same principle as the amusement ride “The Incredible Hulk” I believe. Huge electric linear motors programmable like many machine tools are going to instead of ball screws, things are quite fun to work with and are almost maintenance free compared to a steam piston system.


8 posted on 02/29/2008 5:52:34 AM PST by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: magslinger

ping


9 posted on 02/29/2008 5:54:25 AM PST by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Checkmate Cruiser")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
Picture of Gerald Ford, jumping for the ball on the left, serving on the Monterey, WWII CVL.


10 posted on 02/29/2008 5:58:02 AM PST by Dilbert56 (Harry Reid, D-Nev.: "We're going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert56
I'll add the following to your photos:

Papers Relating to Gerald Ford's U.S. Navy Service, 1941‑1975.

Gerald Ford initially applied for a commission in the active Naval Reserve less than a week after the Japanese bombing of the American fleet at Pearl Harbor . . . .


11 posted on 02/29/2008 6:04:30 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

I was hoping for the USS Calvin Coolidge.


12 posted on 02/29/2008 6:05:40 AM PST by Parmenio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

13 posted on 02/29/2008 6:05:46 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Parmenio

Seriously. He was one of our better presidents.


14 posted on 02/29/2008 6:06:24 AM PST by Parmenio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

Call the Secretary of the Navy

“On 3 March 1819 an act of Congress formally placed the responsibility for assigning names to the Navy’s ships in the hands of the Secretary of the Navy, a prerogative which he still exercises.”

http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq63-1.htm


15 posted on 02/29/2008 6:09:56 AM PST by PurpleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Is this the same technology as rail guns only way bigger?


16 posted on 02/29/2008 6:10:09 AM PST by Slump Tester (What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh -Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Can you say EMP?


17 posted on 02/29/2008 6:13:31 AM PST by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert56

Wow! White men can jump...at least, they could in the 1940s.


18 posted on 02/29/2008 6:13:36 AM PST by meandog (Please pray for future President McCain--day minus 325 and counting! Stay home and get Baraked!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Slump Tester
I am not sure it is bigger. I think this is easier to do than shooting a projectile against a target 300 miles away.
19 posted on 02/29/2008 6:13:51 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
CVN’s are capital ships. If they are to be named after men, then they should be truly great men. Franklin, Madison, Adams, Reagan, Ike, etc.

George H.W. Bush???

20 posted on 02/29/2008 6:15:08 AM PST by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson