[exDemMom]

Voting for someone just because she is a woman does not reflect any capacity whatsoever for thought. True equality means examining the person’s philosophy, accomplishments, etc., without regard to race/gender/other superficial quality, when judging their fitness for a particular position. Women whose criteria for voting are based on the candidates’ superficial qualities are, I hate to say, the strongest argument for not allowing women the right to vote. At the very least, there should be an intelligence test for people wanting to vote.

[elcid1970]

I suppose we’ll soon be seeing Hillary in chaps on horseback declaring that she ain’t got nuthin’ agin folks havin’ guns.

;^)

[Aikonaa]

There is a strong tradition of equality for women in the American West, which stems from the fact that pioneer women had to share the same endurances as the men. This tradition of equality has nothing to do with the perpetual victim mind-set of ‘feminism’ which originated among bored, upper class New England women.

[Liberty Valance]

I knew it would be tough for Hillary when she picked the top of Devils Tower for her campaign headquarters in Wyoming...it can only be accessed by the 'Hill-a-Copter'.

[montag813]

Of course Obama will win WY. Because voters in caucuses are completely unrelated to registered voters at large. Caucus participants are activists, who tend to be far to the left of the average Joe and Jane SixPack Democrat. Texas was prime example. Hillary won the primary and Obama won the caucus. I have no doubt that if Ohio was a caucus he would have won that too.

Obama has basically won only primary states with a majority black Democrat base, or caucuses where Soros-aligned activists have their way.