Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eleni121
The Serbs had never harmed us and posed no threat to us. Yet Bill Clinton is responsible for the killing of over 3,000 Serbs, most of them women and children - one of many reasons why I never want to see the Clintons back in the White House. Disgusting that Bush is now covering up for Clinton and took a stand against the Serbs.
10 posted on 03/08/2008 2:57:59 PM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Dante3; Kolokotronis
This was payback - sacrifice the Orthodox Christians - to the Saudis for the independence of East Timor, a Catholic Christian country which fought for years against muslim dominated Indonesia...any other way to explain it? I'm listening. Bush was waivering (possibly) took his trip to Saudi Arabia (and others to Turkey-—Turkey invaded Iraq remember?—then pulled back after the official announcement) where he was told in no uncertain terms what the Caliphate wanted, and then BINGO he proclaims the bad news.

It was planned this way.

Anyone else have any theories?

33 posted on 03/08/2008 5:24:16 PM PST by eleni121 (Solzhenitsyn on the bombing of Serbia: "no difference whatsoever between NATO and the Nazis")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson