Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans ponder lost election (to succeed Denny Hastert)
The Beacon News ^ | March 11, 2008 | Andre Salles

Posted on 03/12/2008 2:33:57 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued

Saturday's special election has left area Republicans stunned, and some of them are directing their ire at Jim Oberweis and his campaign.

Democrat Bill Foster defeated Oberweis by roughly 5,000 votes Saturday to become the new congressman in the 14th District. That seat has only been held by a Democrat once, immediately after Watergate, and has been in the hands of retired Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert for the past 21 years.

The 14th District has long been considered a Republican stronghold. So how did Foster, a scientist and businessman from Geneva, muster enough votes to win?

(Excerpt) Read more at suburbanchicagonews.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: 110th; 2008; gop; hastert; il2008; oberweis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 03/12/2008 2:33:58 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Imagine how the democrats will feel when Speaker Nancy Pelosi is replaced by Cindy “Peace Mom” Sheehan...

LOL


2 posted on 03/12/2008 2:36:27 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (http://www.fourfriedchickensandacoke.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
So how did Foster, a scientist and businessman from Geneva, muster enough votes to win?

Its Illinois so surely that is a rhetorical question!

3 posted on 03/12/2008 2:36:50 PM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Until the DIVIDE is stopped and the PARTY gets itself back together, no matter what we see with the DEMS in the national limelight, the DEMS are setup to take any open seat that comes available while the Conservatives sit back and whine on and on and on....


4 posted on 03/12/2008 2:37:02 PM PDT by Paige ("Facts are stubborn things." President Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; Norman Bates; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Kuksool; cookcounty; Chi-townChief; ...

This is a huge defeat. Something like this (losing a district once held by a former House Speaker) is a rarity, and we shouldn’t downplay its importance.

More than anything else, I blame Jim Oberweis himself, with Dennis Hastert the runner up for endorsing Oberweis.

Also, all signs indicate that Oberweis is going to stay on the ballot, giving him the opportunity to lose another election.


5 posted on 03/12/2008 2:37:06 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Special elections are never good to use as benchmarks for general trends.... We’ll see what happens next regular election with this district.


6 posted on 03/12/2008 2:37:27 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

It was an off time election with 20% turnout... I am not saying its not something to note, but I don’t think its as big of a deal as is being made by the press...

Had this election happened as part of a normal cycle, you would have had a hell of a lot better turnout than 20%.


7 posted on 03/12/2008 2:38:29 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Republicans need to stop “pondering” and start DOING something. When Dems face an unfavorable landscape, they systematically go about changing it.

RIght after 9/11 it was conventional wisdom that the Dems would be a minority party for decades. By repeating “Bush lied” and other falsehoods, they changed the landscape.

Republicans could do the same thing. Simply repeat your message ad nauseum. Of course, this assumes they come up with a decent message! Whatever, they should stop moping and get about tearing down a Dem and electing Republicans.


8 posted on 03/12/2008 2:40:13 PM PDT by Timeout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Here is an excellent editorial, and its headline is the best part of all:

http://cdobs.com/archive/our-columns/its-not-a-foster-victory-but-an-oberweis-defeat-some-reasons850/


9 posted on 03/12/2008 2:40:34 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
the intensely negative primary election between Oberweis and State Sen. Chris Lauzen might have convinced some Republicans to stay home. After being defeated, Lauzen declined to endorse Oberweis, holding out for an apology for what he saw as an unfair attempt to damage his reputation.

Looks like the Stupid Party shot itself in the foot again. Dry run for the anti-McCainiacs in November who want to see a 'rat socialist elected.

10 posted on 03/12/2008 2:43:33 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Off time elections usually play to the pubs advantage. I saw the writing on the wall here in the Lehigh Valley in 2007 when the dems stomped the pubs.


11 posted on 03/12/2008 2:43:42 PM PDT by stevio (Crunchy Con - God, guns, guts, and organically grown crunchy nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paige

How about trying something new like maybe putting forth candidates who can get elected? It’s not the fault of the voters. It’s the lackluster candidates.


12 posted on 03/12/2008 2:44:34 PM PDT by isrul (Help make koranimals an endangered species)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Timeout

The GOP would probably fare somewhat better if they offered up a couple more decent conservatives.


13 posted on 03/12/2008 2:45:57 PM PDT by Billg64 (LOL ROFL Senator Mccain for what????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Just the beginning of the trend.


14 posted on 03/12/2008 2:46:03 PM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Wow. So this consistent loser Oberweis intends to lose AGAIN in November?
How pathetic...


15 posted on 03/12/2008 2:46:13 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Maybe Jim Oberweis and Alan Keyes can for a perennial candidate club.
16 posted on 03/12/2008 2:49:03 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; BillyBoy; Chi-townChief

Last Aug., I said, on a few sites, “St. Sen. Lauzen should be elected to Congress, and Oberweis should be appointed to replace Lauzen, in the state senate.” I hope that many voters, in that district, agree that I was right. If Lauzen had won the primary, he would have received more votes, during the special general election.


17 posted on 03/12/2008 2:53:03 PM PDT by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Yep, that’s a pretty good column. The author nails Lauzen pretty good, too, and deservedly.

Hey Chris, if Oberweis slanders you, don’t whine about it. Simply insinuate that anonymous people have told you privately about Oberwies’s unhealthy fascination with young boys and his secretly arranged trips to Thailand. Whatever. But don’t whine and sulk. Fight back.


18 posted on 03/12/2008 2:54:43 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stevio

The R candidate in this election is an also ran ad naseum.... you have low turn out, and a poor candidate you get a loss every time regardless of party.


19 posted on 03/12/2008 2:54:45 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PhilCollins

There’s no denying that. This election was a rejection of Oberweis, not an endorsement of Foster.


20 posted on 03/12/2008 2:54:49 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson