This idiot Penn thinks he’s some kind of political genius, but you’ll notice that as a consultant, he hasn’t quit his day job to hop on to the Hiliarly bandwagon with 100 percent dedication to the task of putting the Beast in the White House.
What we’re really seeing is the ever-increasing Clinton-fatigue among the electorate. The voters are tired of the continuous drama-queen mentality, always playing the victim card, lying about everything under the sun, and of *course* accusing everyone else of doing the very things they (the Clintonistas) are doing.
Hiliarly never held a security clearance while First Lady, she never made any decisions with national security overtones, her so-called ‘experience’ is all in her head. Prior to this election cycle, she had NEVER run a national campaign, and it SHOWS.
If Hiliarly wants to claim all that ‘experience’ that her sociopathic spouse has from the Billigula years, she has to take the responsibility for the degradation of our military forces, the foreign policy failures regarding North Korea and the Middle East, and most of all, the failure of the Clinton Administration to face the growing Islamofascist-terrorist threat by treating the FIRST WTC bombing in ‘93 as nothing more than a ‘law enforcement’ issue, rather than an actual attack upon the United States by foreign entities. Somalia is another failure. And of course the failure to properly respond after the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole.
And Mark Penn thinks OBAMA can’t win the general election?
Pot, meet Kettle.
I’m guessing your tag refers to Obama, McCain, and Clinton?
LOLOLOL!
Not that I would want to give Bill any points for integrity, but in all fairness he inherited Somalia from Bush I, and was faced with strong Republican pressure to cut spending, including the military, and enjoy the “peace dividend” from the collapse of the Soviet Union. My son was with the 82nd Airborne in Saudi Arabia and Iraq from August 9, 1990 to April 1991, so I have been paying attention to military questions for a long time. He also spent 8 months in Afghanistan in 2006 with Special Forces.
I seem to recall that when Clinton tried to implement strong measures, he was accused of a “Wag the Dog” scenario by Republicans. Bush II seemed to have inherited a fairly strong military that made short work of both the Afghanistan invasion and the initial Iraq warfare. Unfortunately, Shinseki was right when he urged at least 350,000 troops. When that flap was going on I asked my son how many he thought we should have, and he said 450,000. You will recall that after a year there Brimmer (sp?) said we should have had 500,000. Also Rumsfeld was a strong supporter of the lean and mean armed forces, rather than the robust kind as our overstretch National Guard has learned so bitterly.