Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chainsaw

Bull. If safety was important, there would be no red-light cameras. It would be up to the good judgement of our citizenry as to whether it is safer to stop at the light... or continue driving to avoid a rear-end collision.

With red-light cameras, the choice is gone. One MUST stop or one is in violation of the law. If stopping results in a rear-end collision, well... you no longer have the choice to avoid it.


30 posted on 03/22/2008 7:49:45 PM PDT by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: gogogodzilla

(snip)At the heart of the discussions taking place in city councils and county commissions is tension between the twin benefits that were touted when local governments began installing cameras about a decade and a half ago. Officials were promised that the cameras — which take snapshots of busy intersections, capturing the license plates of any cars that are running the light — would simultaneously save lives and generate millions of dollars in extra fines.(snip)

I agree with you, but I was commenting on the article. Read (smip).


31 posted on 03/23/2008 4:24:52 AM PDT by chainsaw ( No black racist Muslims in the WH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson