Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum
It is not entrapment. I love it when mouth breathing libertines scream about entrapment, when they have no idea what entrapment actually is.

Anyone screaming about this has to be into kiddie porn, because there is no other reason for one to be throwing a tantrum over it.

15 posted on 03/24/2008 2:24:03 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: freedomwarrior998
Anyone screaming about this has to be into kiddie porn, because there is no other reason for one to be throwing a tantrum over it.

And the only reason you'd own a gun is because you want to kill people.

18 posted on 03/24/2008 2:25:41 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: freedomwarrior998; goldstategop
Ever heard of a redirect? It would be easy as hell to set up anybody you disliked.

This is absolutely begging for abuse by law enforcement.

24 posted on 03/24/2008 2:29:02 PM PDT by lesser_satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: freedomwarrior998

“Anyone screaming about this has to be into kiddie porn, because there is no other reason for one to be throwing a tantrum over it.”

You obviously have no understanding of the nature of the internet and how easy it would be for anyone to have the FBI beating down YOUR door for clicking this link.

Have fun in court.


38 posted on 03/24/2008 2:33:50 PM PDT by acw011 (Texan livin Up North.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: freedomwarrior998
"Anyone screaming about this has to be into kiddie porn, because there is no other reason for one to be throwing a tantrum over it."

See post 29.

45 posted on 03/24/2008 2:36:30 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg ("`Eddies,' said Ford, `in the space-time continuum.' `Ah,' nodded Arthur, `is he? Is he?'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: freedomwarrior998; elcid1970

Look to Post 12 to see a possible scenario.


48 posted on 03/24/2008 2:38:09 PM PDT by Old Sarge (CTHULHU '08 - I won't settle for a lesser evil any longer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: freedomwarrior998

Let’s say that a page has 23 legitimate links on it and one that seems to advertise kiddie porn. Have you never hit the incorrect link to a legitimate site? I have. Further, I have hit links to sites that seemed to propose one thing, and found myself located on a site offering up something entirely different.

I have also clicked on a photo on google that seemed tame and wound up on a very vulgar hard core porn site.

Over the years I have found myself on what appeared to be a kiddie porn site at least once. When I realized what the site seemed to be all about, I documented it and notified the local office of the FBI.

In the scenario played out in this sting, I would have been guilty of a felony for such an error, and would have to spend time in prison as well as register as a sex offender.

This may sound reasoned to you, because you think only people looking for kiddie porn wind up on those sites, but that is a totally false premise.

For the record, I don’t frequent hard porn sites or sites that reveal more than you would see at the beach.

It does bother me that when I put in some reasoned searches for non-sexual materials, I frequently run into some very vulgar materials on Google. I could change my setting, but I want to see what any kid frequenting Google would see if they were looking for educational or research materials, to keep tabs on what is going on out there.


60 posted on 03/24/2008 2:43:14 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Some think McCain should pick his No 2 now. I thought the nominee was No 2. And that No 1s me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: freedomwarrior998
Anyone screaming about this has to be into kiddie porn, because there is no other reason for one to be throwing a tantrum over it.

Well, now that you've taken your broad brush to label anyone who sees the inherent danger in this and where it can lead - as perverts = well, speechless.

You'd probably fit right in as a brown-shirted block boss. - (I can 'stereotype" too...

86 posted on 03/24/2008 3:00:24 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: freedomwarrior998
Anyone screaming about this has to be into kiddie porn, because there is no other reason for one to be throwing a tantrum over it.

BS. This is about a general principle. Some can carry this practice out to its logical conclusion and apply it beyond just the scope of just child porn.

That logical conclusion could see this one day applying to anyone clicking on links of sites that sell firearms should the enemies of the 2nd amendment ever have their way.

108 posted on 03/24/2008 3:16:16 PM PDT by Zack Attack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: freedomwarrior998
As a senior systems analyst who is proficient in ASP.NET, C#, javascript, and AJAX......

...... allow me to inform you that you are an idiot.

You're welcome.

125 posted on 03/24/2008 3:39:35 PM PDT by Lazamataz (We're all gonna die!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: freedomwarrior998
Anyone screaming about this has to be into kiddie porn, because there is no other reason for one to be throwing a tantrum over it.

Well anyone knowing a little html can make a link to look different from what you think you're getting. The phisher sites do this to get user names and passwords.

134 posted on 03/24/2008 3:47:49 PM PDT by the_daug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: freedomwarrior998

>>Anyone screaming about this has to be into kiddie porn, because there is no other reason for one to be throwing a tantrum over it.<<

Not really. I am not into porn at all and I am screaming about it.

I fix friends computers for a hobby. I’m sort of the resident expert (relatively speaking anyway). Every single computer I have worked on had porn in the IE cache. Every one!

My wife’s friend gave us her husbands old laptop to give to our granddaughter but first he cleaned all the “important” stuff off. Well, he didn’t do a good enough job because I found tons of porn on it and a lot of stuff from a site called “chix with dix”.

But the worst was not technically even porn: In his personal pictures from a trip to hawaii he had pictures named “babe1.jpg”, etc. He was spotting “hot chicks” in thongs on the beach around him and taking clandestine pictures of them.

My wife and I decided it would be inapropriate to mention this stuff to his wife. I tried to wipe the drive to install Win2k but it wouldn’t take (old computer). But we ended up just throwing it away to be on the safe side.

What man, under the right conditions and out of curiosity, isn’t under at least SOME risk of clicking one of those buttons, even ashamed of himself for doing it although strictly out of curiosity, only to find out big brother was right there behind him just waiting for the opportunity to “flag” him and remove his right to ever own a gun or look his wife in the eye.

Let he who has not sinned cast the first stone.

And believe me, there is a HUGE difference between clicking on a “under aged girls” icon and being an actual pervert. Huge! The reasons for clicking the icon are too numerous to mention, and most of them are completely harmless.

I suspect they are really looking for those who click more than once. But I could be wrong.


160 posted on 03/24/2008 4:11:59 PM PDT by RobRoy (I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: freedomwarrior998
Anyone screaming about this has to be into kiddie porn, because there is no other reason for one to be throwing a tantrum over it.

When they came for the Jews, I said nothing because I'm not Jewish.......

191 posted on 03/24/2008 5:52:25 PM PDT by Cracker Jack (If it weren't for the democrats, republicans would be the worst thing in Washington.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: freedomwarrior998

Not true. It has the potential for abuse.


194 posted on 03/24/2008 6:05:35 PM PDT by beckysueb (Pray for our troops , America, and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: freedomwarrior998
“Anyone screaming about this has to be into kiddie porn, because there is no other reason for one to be throwing a tantrum over it.”

Do you know what spoofing is? Anyone can disguise a link to one of the FBI’s sting sites to look like a harmless link to whatever. Your bank, or insurance company for instance. Do you know anyone who doesn't like you? If you do, or even if you don't, you risk a midnight raid by the FBI. Good luck trying to convince them that you were set up. Actual child molesters all have excuses too. The FBI has heard them all and won't be in the least bit interested in yours.

242 posted on 04/16/2008 10:30:40 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson