Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum
(going to yell now...)

THIS MAN WAS NOT ARRESTED FROM CONTENT FOUND AT HIS HOUSE ON A SEARCH WARRENT!

From the article:

Vosburgh was charged with violating federal law, which criminalizes "attempts" to download child pornography with up to 10 years in prison. Last November, a jury found Vosburgh guilty on that count, and a sentencing hearing is scheduled for April 22, at which point Vosburgh could face three to four years in prison.

And no, I'm not defending perverts.

172 posted on 03/24/2008 4:32:53 PM PDT by frankenMonkey (101st Airborne Army Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: frankenMonkey
WARRENT=WARRANT

My fingers tremble when I yell...

173 posted on 03/24/2008 4:34:42 PM PDT by frankenMonkey (101st Airborne Army Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

To: frankenMonkey
"THIS MAN WAS NOT ARRESTED FROM CONTENT FOUND AT HIS HOUSE ON A SEARCH WARRENT!"

OK now, lets take it to the next level.

We have now a man who has been directly linked to a computer with a cable inserted into his head and hooked to his brain. (google "cyberkinetics BrainGate Neural Interface System") Taking into account the rapid advance of technology how long before we hook up to the net with wireless chips implanted into our heads?

With precedence like this FBI program will "thought crime" be punishable with incarceration or worse?

Slippery slope is soooooo apropos here!

177 posted on 03/24/2008 4:54:54 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg ("`Eddies,' said Ford, `in the space-time continuum.' `Ah,' nodded Arthur, `is he? Is he?'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

To: frankenMonkey
Vosburgh was charged with violating federal law, which criminalizes "attempts" to download...

I'm not defending the fbi here, but after reading that, I wonder if some of the story is being misreported. (How often do they botch stories concerning guns, for example.)

My guess is that he downloaded the bogus file - the "attempt" - and not simply looked at it. There had to be more than a small handful of people who clicked on the link. If there were 100's of raids, then I would think it would have made the news. That said, I agree with most on this thread. This is BS.

196 posted on 03/24/2008 7:02:51 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson