[freedomwarrior998]

As I already stated, the program doesn't work in that manner. There are safeguards in place to ensure that spammers cannot use the hyper-links in the manner described. There are also safeguards in place to ensure that prefetching a link doesn't implicate the innocent.

Why don't you do some investigation over at Eugene Volokh's blog, where he actually gives the program a scholarly review.

[728b]

I tried googleing Eugene Volokh. I click the link and nothing happened. I hope it wasn’t a trick. Hello Mr. Fed really I was trying to read a blog. LOL

[Mad Dawgg]

"There are safeguards in place to ensure that spammers cannot use the hyper-links in the manner described. There are also safeguards in place to ensure that prefetching a link doesn't implicate the innocent."

I see and who gets to decide on the validity of such? If one were defendant in such a case can the validity of the technology be challenged?

How does this tech identify WHO is operating the computer? Does this tech Identify hackers who hack into private wireless networks?

Knowing abit about how such works I would be very interested in just how the FBI identifies the person BEHIND the Keyboard.

Prosecuting for Physical evidence of Kiddie Porn Sickos I am all in favor of. Digital forms of such even if it is found on someone's computer I am leery of using as evidence being it is awfully easy to spoof someone into downloading pics when they just have to get the latest Brittany Spears screen saver or whatever else is used as bait by hackers.

Your assertions have so many holes in them that you don't even get points for righteousness!

Sorry but your attempt at justifying such is graded as: FAIL