Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It’s time to end the Government Property Lease Excise Tax
The Goldwater Institute ^ | April 22, 2008 | Michelle Bolton

Posted on 04/22/2008 11:02:56 AM PDT by GoldwaterInstitute

It’s time to end the Government Property Lease Excise Tax

Michelle Bolton, Goldwater Institute Daily Email, April 22, 2008

Fair and equitable taxation is key to economic freedom and prosperity. Rules that favor a few special interests create an un-level playing field and put other businesses at a disadvantage.

The Government Property Lease Excise Tax (GPLET) is a case in point. It allows cities to take title to land and buildings and then lease them back to a private company for a nominal fee. These businesses then pay a fraction--often one tenth--of what their property taxes would otherwise be.

GPLETs (pronounced “gyplet” as in, “That guy gypped me!”) were sold to lawmakers twelve years ago as a tool cities needed to attract big businesses for economic revitalization.

According to the Maricopa County Treasurer’s office, owners of the Renaissance Square in downtown Phoenix would have paid roughly $1.7 million more in property taxes in 2007 if the property had not been built under a GPLET. The small and medium-sized independent businesses of Arizona--the companies that employ the vast majority of Arizonans--don’t receive GPLET tax breaks.

If property taxes are too high for multi-million dollar companies, then they are too high for mom and pop shops, too. GPLET tax breaks should be eliminated and the property tax lowered for all businesses.

Michelle Bolton is the Arizona state director for the National Federation of Independent Business.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: arizona; bigbusiness; gplet; taxbreak

1 posted on 04/22/2008 11:02:57 AM PDT by GoldwaterInstitute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GoldwaterInstitute

I’ll go you one better. The idea of paying “rent” to the government to live on my land is something that should be gotten rid of entirely.

He who gets paid for the use of land owns the land.


2 posted on 04/22/2008 11:20:39 AM PDT by tueffelhunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson