Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy-Contracted Vessel Fires Warning Shots on Iranian Boats
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,352579,00.html ^

Posted on 04/25/2008 8:03:09 AM PDT by jhpigott

A vessel contracted by the Navy in the Persian Gulf fired warning shots Thursday on two Iranian fast boats, FOX News has learned. The Westward Venture, a ship contracted by the Navy to carry military cargo to Kuwait, fired upon the boats Thursday after attempts to get Iranian boats' attention failed. The ship was about 50 miles off the coast of Iran when the fast boats approached. A Navy security team, armed with M16 rifles and .50-caliber machine guns, was onboard at the time the warning shots were fired.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; kuwait; madeuce; maritime; navy; persiangulf; westwardventure
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-167 next last

1 posted on 04/25/2008 8:03:09 AM PDT by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jeffers; Dog; Cap Huff; 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; maquiladora; GSR-TX; Aragon

ping


2 posted on 04/25/2008 8:03:52 AM PDT by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott

Hope the Brits are paying attention!


3 posted on 04/25/2008 8:07:15 AM PDT by Iron head mike (If were a lib I'd shoot myself(so i could cry about gun control!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott; FARS; tet68; usmcobra; poobear

One can only hope it is starting...


4 posted on 04/25/2008 8:07:50 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty; The Pendleton 8: We are not going down without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott

I wonder if the Persian Gulf could use more artificial reefs.


5 posted on 04/25/2008 8:09:10 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott

When dealing with Iran, warning shots should breach the bridge.


6 posted on 04/25/2008 8:10:40 AM PDT by wastedyears (The US Military is what goes Bump in the night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

Or the outboards, preferably.


7 posted on 04/25/2008 8:12:35 AM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott

It’s clear that Tehran has greenlighted this sort of cat and mouse game.

However, eventually the cat will catch the mouse and beat the ever loving crud out of it.


8 posted on 04/25/2008 8:13:06 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
One can only hope it is starting...

One can only hope it is not starting. Our brave soldiers are already fighting a two front war. They don't need to be fighting a three front war.
9 posted on 04/25/2008 8:15:37 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott

Warning shots?....sink the turds!


10 posted on 04/25/2008 8:17:55 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

Hey, no problem, I’m sure miz paloosie will put a stop to this “contracting” business.


11 posted on 04/25/2008 8:18:23 AM PDT by Let's Roll (As usual, following a shooting spree, libs want to take guns away from those who DIDN'T do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

No problem if they do it from the air and hit them hard. I wouldn’t put boots on the ground in Iran. Just destroy their system of government and the people will take the country back.


12 posted on 04/25/2008 8:18:28 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

I sympathize, but they’re already fighting a three-front war. Unacknowledged conflicts are impossible to win.

Anyway, Coalition Naval forces would suffer the brunt of any additional action. They have been suffering under preposterous ROE for too long: being able to go weapons-free in the gulf as a result of an Iranian casus belli would be a huge step forward.


13 posted on 04/25/2008 8:20:46 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

One can only hope it is starting...

= = =

Yes and mostly no.

When that one lights off . . . it will grow into a true WWIII conflagration and not end until the very satanic world ruler ‘wages war with peace’ as Scripture says of his scripted temporary pseudo peace . . . . only to get going again when he begins his slaughter of Jews at the New Temple courtyard . . . and then it won’t end until Armageddon . . .

. . . after 1/3 to 2/3 of the world’s population has been killed.

Amanutjob of Iran needs put in his place . . . I wish there were a better . . . singular . . . way to do it.


14 posted on 04/25/2008 8:22:47 AM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RC2
Just destroy their system of government and the people will take the country back.

Won't work. Another more extreme dictator will fill the power void if we strike and leave. We would have to occupy for years to prevent it. History proves this is the case almost every time.
15 posted on 04/25/2008 8:24:19 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
Anyway, Coalition Naval forces would suffer the brunt of any additional action.

Coalition? That means the US Navy.

We are going to be stoplossing troops into fourth and fifth tours of mideast hotzones. There's just no way to do the Iran thing successfully without occupation and a lot more feet on the ground. I don't support expanding the current mission into Iran.
16 posted on 04/25/2008 8:26:47 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

One wishes that an attack on Iran would eliminate most of the need to have troops in Iraq, since they are the cause of much of the trouble there.

One wishes...


17 posted on 04/25/2008 8:27:40 AM PDT by SlowBoat407 (It's a fine line between Guardian Angel and Stalker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: txflake

hearing the Iranian boats closed to within 100 yards


18 posted on 04/25/2008 8:39:04 AM PDT by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407
One wishes that an attack on Iran would eliminate most of the need to have troops in Iraq, since they are the cause of much of the trouble there.

One also wishes for some strategic thinkers in Washington...........

19 posted on 04/25/2008 8:51:21 AM PDT by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Quix
When that one lights off . . . it will grow into a true WWIII conflagration and not end until the very satanic world ruler ‘wages war with peace’ as Scripture says of his scripted temporary pseudo peace . . . . only to get going again when he begins his slaughter of Jews at the New Temple courtyard . . . and then it won’t end until Armageddon . . .

When you put it that way, it begins to sound like WWI and WWII... or maybe WWI/WWII and the Cold War.

20 posted on 04/25/2008 8:56:39 AM PDT by pgyanke ("Huntered"--The act of being ignored by media and party to prevent name recognition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-167 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson