While both Hitlery and Osamabama are utter losers, Hitlery has as advantage that might push her over the top in November, namely, control or near-control of the Xlintoon corruption machine. Osamabama doesn't have a hope of getting control of it nationwide, other than fractionally in areas where his supporters reign.
Osamabama is the single most beatable candidate in American history who has ever come so close to being his party's (cough, choke) nominee. He literally cannot win a national election, even with considerable amounts of fraud.
If Limbaugh were the political analyst he considers himself to be, he would have realised this fact long since, and directed Operation Chaos to support Osamabama.
Was it the ol' toe-sucker, fat Dickie Morris, who said recently that Osamabama would lose 47 states? For once, Morris has a clue. An Osamabama nomination would make Du-du-ka-ka in 1988 look like a powerhouse candidate.
Perhaps, but the only reason that Obama is now so beatable is the Wright and Bittergate episodes, which would’ve never happened had Rush not launched “Operation Chaos” to keep Hillary in the game.
Limbaugh has it entirely wrong with ''Operation Chaos''. The goal is to force the 'Rats to select the most beatable candidate.No, you have it entirely wrong.
Which was Hillary, now it's Obama, then it'll be Hillary, then..
There's no way to know what will happen in elections this far out. You don't know who will be more beatable in November. Hell, expert pols don't know. And no one knows what events will happen and what will matter to the electorate then, etc., etc..
What is known is the more your opponents fight each other, the weaker they become.
THIS is the strategy of Operation Chaos.
On the other hand, the abundant list of negatives contained in the article IMO gives a good preview of why Hillary can’t win....there’s too much baggage and she keeps adding more (Bosnia snipers). Seems to me that Hillary is just too disliked nationally to be a threat.
Obama, whose baggage has not reached fruition yet, is the best con man since Bill Clinton, but his giddy fans can’t, or haven’t, seen that “dark side” (PI) yet. I wonder if he’d be ahead if the “Wright stuff” (PI again!)had come out before the primaries had gotten underway?
Hillary's loss of the nomination would be an advantage for McCain; her voters, should she not win the nomination, are more than likely to vote for McCain, whereas Obama's supporters are more likely to not vote at all. Polls show that Dem voters see little difference between the policies of the HC and McCain, and in reality, there isn't.
Rush's intent was never to get Hillary elected; the purpose is to weaken both candidates and the Democratic Party. Early on in the campaign, so much negative attention was focused on Hillary that Obama got a pass, and as a result he garnered all those delegates. Now he's being exposed as even further left, incompetent and unlikeable than HC, due not only to the efforts of Rush, but to the constant drumbeat of right talk radio and the internet. The dirt on Obama has been out there for a while, and now it's getting the attention it deserves, and it's a serious dilemma for the Dems.
You need to put down the extreme paranoia pipe when it comes to Hillary; yeah, the Clintons are power-hungry, immoral and will do anything to win, but after eight years the blinkered hatred is really getting old. She's actually garnered a grudging respect from some quarters for standing up against a fraud and a racist, while McCain comes out swinging -- against his own party. If McCain thinks he can beat Obama by virtue of holier-than-thou-ness and sanctimonious platitudes, he's in for rude surprise. Obama's people are just as ruthless as Clinton's. It took Hillary over a year to figure out how to best the media-darling Messiah, and McCain's far less adaptable than the Clinton machine.
I think you are right. Those who see Hitlery as the “easily beaten” Democrat are fantasizing that this will be an honest election. Some of us are aware that the name Clinton is synonymous with vote buying and corruption of all kinds.