Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When Candidates Can't Lose - Making House Races Competitive again
Washington Post ^ | April 29th, 2008 | Bruce Reed and Marc Dunkelman

Posted on 04/28/2008 3:05:36 PM PDT by The_Republican

Competition and democracy go hand in hand. After races that came down to the narrowest of margins in Florida in 2000 and Ohio in 2004, Americans are getting used to hard-fought, close presidential elections -- and the 2008 campaign is the most electrifying in years. Both Democratic candidates have won more primary votes than any previous nominee. Both have ushered new voters into the process, as has the sheer closeness of the campaign.

But real competition is still a rare commodity in the House of Representatives, which the Framers designed to be hard-fought. For all the talk of thin majorities in both chambers of Congress, artfully designed districts protect most House members from the sword of Damocles. During the 2002 election, when Republicans maintained control of the House, a full 91 percent of members defeated their opponents by 10 percentage points or more. Four years later -- in an election in which Democrats took control of both chambers -- all but 60 of the 435 voting members of the House won by more than 10 points.

The relative comfort that most members of Congress enjoy -- so stark in comparison to the half-percent and 2 1/2 -percent margins in the past two presidential elections -- diminishes the power voters can exert over the agenda in Washington. When members can't lose, voters do -- because it takes the pressure off Congress to get the job done.

Besides letting members off the hook for failing to do the people's business, noncompetitive districts also suppress voter participation. Elections where the outcome is assumed from the start receive less media attention. Candidates do not feel as compelled to make their cases to the public. And voters aren't stupid: When the outcome is essentially predetermined, there's less reason to cast a ballot.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 110th; 2008; competitive; elections; houseraces

1 posted on 04/28/2008 3:05:37 PM PDT by The_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

The Soviet Union’s Supreme Soviet had a higher turnover rate than the USA’s congress.

Ponder that.


2 posted on 04/28/2008 3:09:32 PM PDT by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

today, it just about takes a real miracle to defeat an incumbent anything. that’s a real problem.


3 posted on 04/28/2008 3:10:51 PM PDT by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
"...the 2008 campaign is the most electrifying in years.

Here's the real story:

"...the 2008 campaign is the most electrifying stupifying in years.

4 posted on 04/28/2008 3:30:28 PM PDT by Iron Munro (Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

I imagine that a few election cycles after the gerrymandering ends some of the ‘safe districts’ are a little less safe.


5 posted on 04/28/2008 3:48:48 PM PDT by Tallguy (Tagline is offline till something better comes along...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson