Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Navy launches its first Littoral Combat Ship
Gizmag.com ^ | 05/15/08 | Gizmag.com

Posted on 05/17/2008 3:42:33 AM PDT by Reaganesque

May 15, 2008 With naval battles on the high seas now virtually extinct for the U.S. armed forces, the navy's role has become more one of infantry invasion and airstrike support - and with this new role comes a need for vessels more suited to littoral (just offshore) operations. The initial order was placed back in 2005, and the first delivery, the U.S.S. Independence, has just been launched, a speedy trimaran with helicopter decks, a stealthy radar profile and a healthy array of arms. It's configurable to suit a wide array of littoral combat missions, including minesweeping, anti-submarine and surface combat support - and now that we've seen it in the flesh, it wouldn't look the least bit out of place soaring over the credits of a Star Wars movie.

The U.S.S. Independence is the first of a projected fleet of between 50 and 100 littoral combat ships (LCSs) the US Navy will be adding to their fleet over the coming years. Built on a well-proven Australian-designed trimaran platform from Austal, the LCS is fast, stealthy and well suited to a range of offshore combat support missions.

The rear deck is suitable for two Seahawk helicopters, and can also support Harrier jump-jets if necessary. Onboard weaponry includes a 57mm Bofors gun, four .50 caliber guns, chaff, missile and torpedo decoy launchers, an 11-missile SeaRAM launcher, 8 Harpoon surface-to-surface missiles, mine detection and towed array sonar units, and a vertical launching system for ASROC-style surface missiles or Evolved Sea Sparrow type missile defenses.

The U.S.S. Inedpendence was built and delivered by General Dynamics, as part of a four-ship evaluation plan. Two were to be built by General Dynamics, two by Lockheed Martin, and the designs were to be evaluated to determine the superior design. Sadly, cost blowouts by both General Dynamics and Lockheed Martin have seen the remaining three evaluation ships cancelled and the Navy is putting together a new bidding program to have the remaining three evaluation ships contracted and built.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: generaldynamics; harriers; launch; littoral; navy; secondlcs; trimaran; ussindependence
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
Cool looking ship. Here's some pics:


1 posted on 05/17/2008 3:42:33 AM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Interesting. And shows me I’m quite old. When I served, the USS Independence was an aircraft carrier.


2 posted on 05/17/2008 3:46:51 AM PDT by brownsfan (Algore makes P.T. Barnum look like a piker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Is there a C class ship?


3 posted on 05/17/2008 3:47:05 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

It sure has a big flight deck!


4 posted on 05/17/2008 3:47:44 AM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

May God always bless this ship and her crew!


5 posted on 05/17/2008 3:49:51 AM PDT by Broker (Grandpa Petti Bones wants to know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken522

Big and multi-purpose flight deck. Down underside, this ship appears to have four water jet ports. Very useful in real shallow waters...


6 posted on 05/17/2008 3:53:14 AM PDT by Broker (Grandpa Petti Bones wants to know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

I have no idea.


7 posted on 05/17/2008 3:54:32 AM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

Yes, it’s called the USS HRC.


8 posted on 05/17/2008 3:58:42 AM PDT by ComputerGuy (Delphi for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Why wouldn’t a ship designed for close to shore work need a lot more guns. After all, land battles seem to rely on big tank guns and howiters etc. It seems the Navy has dropped cannons from almost all its designs.
Wasn’t this tried with aircraft back in the 60’s 70’s when it was thought dogfighting would only be fought with missles?


9 posted on 05/17/2008 3:59:09 AM PDT by blueheron2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Broker

Using water jets, it’s going to need pretty reliable intake filters that don’t need crewmembers to be constantly clearing them of mud, seaweed, and trash - I take it they’ve got it figured out?


10 posted on 05/17/2008 4:11:58 AM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

“Cool looking ship”

I disagree. It ain’t pretty, BUT, It does not have to be pretty.

Stealth has taken all the prettyness out of both ships and airplanes. Look at the B-2 bomber Vs. the B-1.

The B-1 looks like it is doing 250 MPH while parked and the B-2 looks like it is still in the packing crate.

The F-117 Vs. the F-16. The F-117 proves that a piano can fly if given enough power, while the F-16 is the perfect meld of man and machine.

A stealthy ship is a strange looking bird, but I am willing to bet that it will be above and beyond anything produced by any other country in the world.

I seem to remember Australia loaning us one of their littoral ships for evaluation a few years ago. I wonder if this ship came out of that experiment.

.....Bob


11 posted on 05/17/2008 4:16:30 AM PDT by Lokibob (Some people are like slinkys. Useless, but if you throw them down the stairs, you smile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

OK, I need to ask a stupid question. What is “littoral”? I’m not familiar with the term.


12 posted on 05/17/2008 4:19:18 AM PDT by GadareneDemoniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Broker

“Very useful in real shallow waters...”

Once!!!!!!!!


13 posted on 05/17/2008 4:21:26 AM PDT by Quick Shot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blueheron2
It seems the Navy has dropped cannons from almost all its designs.

A concern of mine too. This ship seem under gunned for shore support of infantry. IMO shore support should require either a gun of at least 5" caliber or a very large missile (cruise or short range ballistic) load out, this ship seems to have neither.

14 posted on 05/17/2008 4:22:59 AM PDT by Fraxinus (My opinion, worth what you paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ken522
Somewhere at the top of the USN there is a love of waterjets. The rest of the world, that actually depend on their vessels, don't use jets. Ask the Navy just why are the Mark V's out of service after a very short life.... Israeli’s had them, did not keep them.
15 posted on 05/17/2008 4:24:38 AM PDT by Quick Shot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

But aren’t they all Literal Combat Ships ?


16 posted on 05/17/2008 4:25:10 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

One Phalanx defensive weapon per side, if one fails is that side unprotected? Whats plan B?


17 posted on 05/17/2008 4:26:58 AM PDT by blueheron2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GadareneDemoniac

Shallow water, generally near shore, less than 300 ft. deep.


18 posted on 05/17/2008 4:32:00 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GadareneDemoniac

Littoral = http://www.blurtit.com/q470662.html


19 posted on 05/17/2008 4:41:06 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Under gunned, I agree. The potential, however, is there for one seriously stable weapons platform. What's up with this navy's aversion to guns?
20 posted on 05/17/2008 4:41:33 AM PDT by jabonz08 (When rights become privileges, only the privileged will have rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson