Posted on 05/26/2008 1:32:49 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
OKLAHOMA CITY - A call from death row inmate Terry Lyn Short interrupted a meeting in the office of his attorney, James Rowan.
Short wanted a promise that, after he is put to death next month, he won't end up in a pauper's grave in the cemetery that contains the bodies of many of those hanged, electrocuted and lethally injected at the 100-year-old Oklahoma State Penitentiary.
Rowan told his 47-year-old client not to be concerned about that. "It's not going to cost you anything, so don't worry about it. That's the least of your worries," he said.
What worries Rowan and other defense attorneys is the possibility that an innocent man could be executed now that the nation's death-row machine is gearing up again following the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that upheld the constitutionality of lethal injection.
They point to past death sentences of men who were later exonerated, blaming ineffective lawyers, overzealous prosecutors and shoddy evidence.
"The answer is yes, it could happen," said Rowan, who has defended more than 40 capital cases.
Since 1973, 129 people have walked off death rows in 26 states after evidence proved they were wrongfully convicted, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.
Florida leads all states with 22 exonerations, followed by 18 in Illinois. Oklahoma is one of five states that have each freed eight inmates from death row. One of the Oklahoma men, Ron Williamson, spent nine years on death row and came within five days of execution before he was set free by DNA evidence. The case formed the basis of John Grisham's best-selling "The Innocent Man."
Oklahoma's executioners have administered lethal injections to 86 people since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976, trailing only Texas with 405 and Virginia with 98.
Nobody has ever been able to produce irrefutable proof that any innocent man was executed in recent U.S. history, but Oklahoma's execution of Malcolm Rent Johnson has troubled many death penalty opponents. He went to his execution proclaiming his innocence.
A star prosecution witness against Johnson, convicted of the 1981 rape and strangulation of an elderly woman, was police chemist Joyce Gilchrist, who was later fired amid allegations of shoddy forensic work and misleading testimony.
"There were serious questions about his case," said Vicki Werneke, chief of the capital post-conviction division of the Oklahoma Indigent Defense System. "There was a lot of circumstantial evidence in that case, but he was executed in 2000, right before the whole issue with Joyce Gilchrist came to light."
Attempts to contact Gilchrist for comment were unsuccessful; there is no listed telephone number for her in Oklahoma City.
A current case that has raised questions is that of Paris Lapriest Powell, convicted in the 1993 shooting death of a 14-year-old in a gang-related, drive-by shooting in Oklahoma City.
Powell, then 19, and a co-defendant were convicted and sentenced to death based largely on the testimony of prosecution witness Derick Smith, a convicted drug dealer who has since recanted his testimony and said he lied.
A federal judge has ordered a new trial for Powell, now 34. The state has appealed the judge's ruling.
Powell, one of 83 condemned inmates in the "H-unit" of the state penitentiary, has always maintained his innocence.
"I've never really sat back and contemplated my last meal or anything like that. I've refused to accept that," Powell said in a recent interview with The Associated Press.
He describes a sense of community on Oklahoma's death row, where inmates share a common goal of avoiding the nearby death chamber.
"You can't help but to think about it. You always know that it's there," Powell said.
"I don't prefer death at all, but if I have to die ... I'd choose old age."
Both Powell and Johnson were prosecuted by the office of Bob Macy, Oklahoma County's chief prosecutor for more than two decades.
Macy, now 78 and retired, oversaw an office that sent to death row 34 of the 86 inmates who have been executed in Oklahoma since executions resumed in 1990.
While Macy acknowledges that forensic science has advanced greatly in recent years and that appellate courts sometimes criticized his arguments, he said he never sought the death penalty unless he was convinced a defendant was guilty.
"I have always believed the death penalty is a deterrent, and it's one reason I sought the death penalty as often as I did," he said.
"We tried at least 60 capital murder cases, and I think we got the death penalty in 54 of them," he said in a telephone interview. "The only time you get the death penalty is when you have greatly cruel, sadistic-type crime."
Yeah, sure.
Does “wrongfully convicted” mean “total innocence” or the use of a loophole??
Don't forget how often we're assured that these are the cases that get the greatest care. Makes you wonder about the rest -- think Nifong?
—see this for Mark Furhman’s look at the Oklahoma justice system—
Thousands of times more criminals have been released or paroled by the system, and killed innocent people. This is never spoken about, but it dwarfs the number of executed vermin.
i (wishfully) interpreted the title in a different manner.
I just wish they’d get around to that cop-killer Mumia Abu Jamal. I can’t believe that people defend this scum, and completely disregard the victim, the cop this scum killed. This world is bass-ackwards anymore in so many ways. Defending murderous scum, while trying to push ever closer to outright killing innocent babies, even after a live birth, or killing sick and elderly people in the name of “cost effectiveness”. God has got to judge this sick world before much longer.
Whatever it takes man.
In American jurisprudence there is no verdict of innocent. Once your case has made it to trial, you cannot be found innocent, only ‘not guilty’ which isn’t quite the same thing.
That’s a good post, see also my post 12.
These numbers look like commutations rather that exonerate and release.
Yeah, sure.
A case here in MO had turned me into a very limited death penalty proponent. There are some cases where it's called for, if there's absolutely no possible doubt... But when you're dealing with eye-witness testimony, then no, no way...
In MO there was an assistant prosecutor who actually said that an innocent man should be put to death because he had gotten a fair trial and found guilty - and this was AFTER proof of his innocence had been discovered and revealed. Check out the case of Joseph Amrine. I know the lawyer who handled his appeals. That did it for me.
Mark
Executing "vermin," not a bad thing. Executing someone who's wrongfully convicted of a capital crime, I'd have to call THAT a bad thing.
What needs to be done is reform parole and early release. The two aren't connected.
Mark
Does the word "Nifong" mean anything to you? Check out the case of Joseph Amrine, who was completely innocent of the crime of murder that he was charged with, and convicted of. In fact, one of the eye witnesses against him WAS the murderer.
Mark
With such wholesale disregard for even the most defenseless, innocent life, why would anyone be surprised the wicked remarks of the wicked prosecutor?
I do believe that the criteria for a guilty verdict is “within reasonable doubt”...
Not, “beyond absolute certainty”!
Correct me if I wrong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.