Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Iraqi Upturn
Washington Post ^ | 1 June 2008 | Editorial Staff

Posted on 06/01/2008 5:47:59 AM PDT by shrinkermd

Don't look now, but the U.S.-backed government and army may be winning the war.[From the Washington Post!]

THERE'S BEEN a relative lull in news coverage and debate about Iraq in recent weeks -- which is odd, because May could turn out to have been one of the most important months of the war. While Washington's attention has been fixed elsewhere, military analysts have watched with astonishment as the Iraqi government and army have gained control for the first time of the port city of Basra and the sprawling Baghdad neighborhood of Sadr City, routing the Shiite militias that have ruled them for years and sending key militants scurrying to Iran. At the same time, Iraqi and U.S. forces have pushed forward with a long-promised offensive in Mosul, the last urban refuge of al-Qaeda. So many of its leaders have now been captured or killed that U.S. Ambassador Ryan C. Crocker, renowned for his cautious assessments, said that the terrorists have "never been closer to defeat than they are now."

Iraq passed a turning point last fall when the U.S. counterinsurgency campaign launched in early 2007 produced a dramatic drop in violence and quelled the incipient sectarian war between Sunnis and Shiites. Now, another tipping point may be near, one that sees the Iraqi government and army restoring order in almost all of the country, dispersing both rival militias and the Iranian-trained "special groups" that have used them as cover to wage war against Americans.

...Still, the rapidly improving conditions should allow U.S. commanders to make some welcome adjustments -- and it ought to mandate an already-overdue rethinking by the "this-war-is-lost" caucus in Washington, including Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.).

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; alqaedainiraq; baghdadsurge; iraq; iraqiarmy; liberalmedia; mosul; progress; sadrcity; surge; upturn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
Viet Nam redux! We signed a peace treaty and the war ended with few or no troops in Viet Nam on 29 March 1973.

The Democrat Congress declared a defeat when North Viet Nam invaded with tanks. Congress guaranteed defeat by closing off aid and any US air strikes on the tanks.

Ever since the constant mantra is the war was lost and we should have learned an important lesson. We did learn a lesson--the Democrats are not to be trusted once they decide to declare defeat.

1 posted on 06/01/2008 5:48:00 AM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Wait....this was in the Washington Post?! I think a pig just flew by my window.


2 posted on 06/01/2008 5:52:41 AM PDT by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Copperheads..good name for the current bunch.


3 posted on 06/01/2008 5:52:57 AM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

This is Bush’s fault!


4 posted on 06/01/2008 5:53:57 AM PDT by Eurale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130
I think a pig just flew by my window.

I saw it too. Did yours have a snowball that said "made in hell" stuck in his mouth?

5 posted on 06/01/2008 5:55:41 AM PDT by Gumption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gumption

Yep..that’s the one!


6 posted on 06/01/2008 5:58:42 AM PDT by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

The war in Iraq will expose the democrats as the lowlife losers they really are. It would be a beautiful thing if the actions of the military brought defeat to the democrats.


7 posted on 06/01/2008 6:19:24 AM PDT by peeps36 (Politician = Corrupt Degenerate Loser = Ted, Nancy, Barry, Jack and Many More)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Amazing.

But then they end the editorial with this: “When Mr. Obama floated his strategy for Iraq last year, the United States appeared doomed to defeat. Now he needs a plan for success.”

As if it doesn’t really matter that Obama misjudged the situation completely. He just needs a new plan for the new situation that is totally different from the old situation, and everything will be fine.


8 posted on 06/01/2008 6:28:18 AM PDT by Dako no tane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

“a relative lull in news coverage and debate about Iraq in recent weeks — which is odd, because May could turn out to have been one of the most important months of the war”

Actually, it’s not odd. Things are going well so the MSM does not want to report on it.


9 posted on 06/01/2008 6:28:47 AM PDT by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peeps36
The war in Iraq will expose the democrats as the lowlife losers they really are.

Their new mantra will be... “we can't afford it”... and the DBM will back them up.

10 posted on 06/01/2008 6:29:08 AM PDT by johnny7 (Don't mess with my tag-lines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gumption
"I saw it too. Did yours have a snowball that said "made in hell" stuck in his mouth?"

The one I saw was red and was towing a "Ronald Reagan for President" banner.

11 posted on 06/01/2008 6:31:57 AM PDT by Desron13 (If you constantly vote between the lesser of two evils then evil is your ultimate destination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dako no tane
“But then they end the editorial with this: “When Mr. Obama floated his strategy for Iraq last year, the United States appeared doomed to defeat. Now he needs a plan for success.”


If a Democrat wins in November, they want them to be take credit for winning the war.
12 posted on 06/01/2008 6:31:59 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

“relative lull” reporting has dropped 92%!
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/265389.php


13 posted on 06/01/2008 6:33:17 AM PDT by enough_idiocy (Holding my nose in 2008. I disagree with McCain on lots of issue, but with the Democrats on more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/06/the_new_copperheads.html


14 posted on 06/01/2008 6:34:06 AM PDT by enough_idiocy (Holding my nose in 2008. I disagree with McCain on lots of issue, but with the Democrats on more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: frankjr

Network Coverage of Iraq War Falls 92% Since Surge Success
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/265389.php

As Surge Succeeds— Iraq Coverage Declines 92% In One Year
Democracy Project analyzes a recent report published at the American Journalism Review titled: “Whatever Happened to Iraq?”
Network news devoted to Iraq dropped from 23% to 3% (92% decline) compared to last year.
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/05/as-surge-succeeds-iraq-coverage.html


15 posted on 06/01/2008 6:35:21 AM PDT by enough_idiocy (Holding my nose in 2008. I disagree with McCain on lots of issue, but with the Democrats on more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
‘Viet Nam redux! We signed a peace treaty and the war ended with few or no troops in Viet Nam on 29 March 1973.
The Democrat Congress declared a defeat when North Viet Nam invaded with tanks. Congress guaranteed defeat by closing off aid and any US air strikes on the tanks.”

The Democrat defeatists have a problem with Iraq. They may no longer have the means to cause defeat. The Iraq army is rapidly gaining in capability, and they have the oil wealth to sustain themselves if the Democrats cut off aid.

Things must be going really well in Iraq if the Washington Post is advising Barrack to reposition himself so that he can claim that he was for victory all along.

16 posted on 06/01/2008 6:35:58 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl

ping


17 posted on 06/01/2008 6:36:25 AM PDT by Tribune7 (How is inflicting pain and death on an innocent, helpless human being for profit, moral?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
"THERE'S BEEN a relative lull in news coverage and debate about Iraq in recent weeks --"

THERE'S BEEN an orchestrated blackout in the Main Stream Media news coverage and debate about Iraq in recent weeks --

There, I fixed it.

18 posted on 06/01/2008 6:38:32 AM PDT by Desron13 (If you constantly vote between the lesser of two evils then evil is your ultimate destination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

So the WaPo is the first member of the liberal media to admit what everyone else has already known for more than a year.


19 posted on 06/01/2008 6:59:14 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Hold on. Did it say “may” in the editorial?


20 posted on 06/01/2008 7:07:12 AM PDT by 12Gauge687 (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson