Having spent this many years waiting for the final demise of the Clintons I find it difficult to admit, but admit I must:
If a democrat had to be elected this time, the country would be better off with Hillary than Obama. There. I said it.
Hillary’s damage can be fixed. Obama may do damage that cannot be fixed.
So, we work harder than ever to keep him out of the White House. They are equally liberal. They would appoint the same judges. I respectfully dispute the premise. She knows how to abuse power and would abuse power. We would have a better chance battling him. He would not dare try to pull the things the Clintons pulled.
I am, of course, worried about him defending the country. He is hopelessly naive. Kennedy was naive when he met with Khruschev. That is why Khruschev had the Berlin Wall built and put missiles in Cuba. He saw Kennedy as weak. That weakness was exploited. If Obama wins, he will be meeting with military advisors who will tell him we cannot set a timetable and let the enemy know when we will leave Iraq. He had better listen.
I would rather HRC be the nominee than BHO for the same reason.
Senator Obama wants to change the USA from the only superpower to a more mediocre status.
I think HRC’s policies will do that, but I don’t think she has American decline on her agenda like Obama does.
Obama will also side against Israel.
Hillary won’t.
He will not use force or the threat of force in furtherance of our national interest.
Hillary will.
HRC may give MAC a tougher contest, but a President Obama could put us tango uniform.
I surmise that we are likely in accord on most important things.
In my opinion, Obama as President would likely be much less damaging to OUR Constitution than either McCain or Clinton.
Even Democrats would not allow him (of their own Party) to change certain things.