Obama is the first campaign on record to support illegal vandalism to "get the message out"
This graffiti is NOT by Shepherd Fairey but it is ALL street warfare propaganda:
This IS by Fairey and appears to be posted (illegally?) outdoors:
Posted on 06/06/2008 9:43:28 AM PDT by The_Republican
Back in 1960 the skills required to become President of the United States changed forever. That was the year that John F. Kennedy debated Richard M. Nixon on national network television for the first time. When reminiscing about Kennedy's win, pundits love to cite that he was tanned, good looking, had great hair and had his make-up professionally applied, while Mr. Nixon appeared pale, had a nervous demeanor and sweaty brow. They say that Nixon won on the radio but Kennedy won on TV. 1960 ushered in the era of the Network politician. For better or for worse, after the 1960 debate, not only did every politician have to have video skills, they had to have expert ones.
Today, aside from video, Senators Obama and McCain are going to face off across several digital consumer touchpoints including: the web, short form video, the blogosphere, time-shifted television, social networks, SMS, ringtones, mobile applications, even wikis. 2008 will usher in the era of the Networked politician. For better or for worse, not only will every politician need to have advanced media skills, they are going to need expert ones.
I know it's early days for the national race, but - just for fun - let's have a look at how the candidates are handling the transition from Network to Networked campaigning.
JohnMcCain.com is a very conservative website (pardon the pun). It feels old and clunky. To find some online video you must click "News & Media," then click "Multimedia" and when you finally get to the page, you find the blip.tv player a page full of single line descriptions and links to videos and branded links to YouTube and Veoh. There is no "multimedia," on the page - just short form video. The presentation is fairly disjointed. Actually, it looks like video is simply bolted on to the site and there is no context of any kind. There are no best practices about the implementation or the messaging. Anyone who is "in the culture" would view this part of the site as a hodgepodge of disparate content and know it was not for them. On the other hand, anyone not "in the culture" would immediately be put off by the complexity. One wonders who this part of the website is for?
At BarackObama.com you are greeted by a best practices, embedded video of Senator Obama welcoming you to his site. The link to his media area clearly defines Barack TV, which opens a well stocked Brightcove video player; a flickr-based photo page; a download page complete with everything a web-savvy digital native might want to download (including buddy icons) and a mobile page with Barack ringtones and SMS alerts subscription opportunities.
If this is the first Networked campaign, Senator McCain is looking like a digital tourist and Senator Obama is looking like a man who knows and respects the conventions of digital life in the 21st Century.
One might argue that Senator McCain's base is not really the "online crowd." For example, John has 53,381 MySpace friends and 136,793 Facebook friends. Barack has 386,341 MySpace friends and 894,666 people have friended him on Facebook. Barack twitters (http://twitter.com/barackobama) (following: 37,151; followers: 36,101; updates: 129), John does not.
Senator Obama has video channels on a multitude of social networking sites like Facebook, MySpace, YouTube, flickr, digg, twitter, eventful, linked in, blackplanet, faithbase, eons, glee, mi genti, asian ave, dnc partybuilder and mybatanga. In fact, Barack even has his own social network site http://my.barackobama.com/. Senator McCain … not so much.
McCain's largest YouTube count is 1,846,797 for a video called "John McCain's YouTube Problem Just Became A Nightmare"
Senator McCain's presence on YouTube is mostly spoofs and negative user videos about him. His biggest YouTube moment was when a supporter was filmed asking "How do we beat the bitch?" On the other side, Obama has an insane online video following with offerings like Obama Girl and will.i.am's "Yes We Can" video with over 8 million views.
Not to put too fine a point on it, Obama raised more than $200 million from more than 1.3 million people (most of it online), announced his candidacy via a web video (so did hill-dog) and his campaign used wiki's to organize campaign managers.
I think it's fair to say that Senator Obama is the clear leader in the transition from Network to Networked candidacy. The big question is: "Will it matter?"
Like I said, it's early days in the first broadband presidential race. Will the reach of network television still be the deciding factor or, will advanced media's ability to cater to a fragmented base of single-issue voters and niche constituencies win the day? My guess is that it will be a sophisticated combination of both. The winner of this particular election will have demonstrated (one way or the other) the value of their particular brand of message management. However it unfolds, from a media perspective, it is sure to be the most interesting campaign in history.
FALSE.
Howard Dean’s internet staff (Dean’s ONLY presidential campaign success was ON the internet) has been behind John McCain’s 2008 presidential website since 2006.
They may not be working for him as hard as they should be but among the first people to get onboard were the Deaniacs.
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/notion?pid=115856
Democrats for McCain posted by Ari Berman on 08/24/2006 @ 3:12pm
It was only a matter of time before some Democrats began jumping ship to join the all-but-announced McCain for President campaign.
The first casualty is Nicco Mele, the former webmaster of the groundbreaking Dean for America campaign. According to the Hotline, Mele, whose firm Echo Ditto represents over twenty Democratic and progressive causes, has agreed to become one of McCain’s key online strategists.
There was a really good article a few weeks back on Spectator.com’s website that delved into the Nixon/Kennedy debates. Cosmetic circumstances aside, Nixon lost because of what he was saying—basically playing the milquetoast republican with no ideas of his own—rather than serving up bold conservative principles, a mistake he did not repeat in ‘68 (”law and order”). The article also mentioned similar wishy-washy, me-too-just-not-as-much republicanism in Thomas E. Dewey’s campaign against Harry Truman or Wendell Willkie vs. FDR.
If McCain blows this it will be on the weakness of his arguments and the all-around lack of fire in his campaigning.
It was the internet that saved Bush's campaign in 2004. From exposure of the forged National Guard memos to the Swift Boat Veterans.
The candidates' own websites offer very little influence in the general campaign.
Somehow I knew the media would start correlating Obama/McCain to Nixon/Kennedy.
Conventional wisdom (which isn’t always right) said that Kennedy won the televised debate while Nixon won among those who listened on the radio.
Probably also broken down to different demographics who would watch/own a tv vs. still be listening to nightly radio.
Troops, beware of Obamatrolls. They aren't here to talk, just to sour Republican turnout.
A. No.
Just like Joe Trippi was feted as the greatest thing since sliced bread for his "innovative" use of the web - after managing Howard Dean's miserable failure of a campaign, many overestimate the technology's role in a campaign. It's a necessary but not sufficient matter, and even the zoomiest site will not compensate for the insufficiency of Obama's experience.
Exactly. Who will be viewing all that fancy pizaz on B.O.s web site? The yoots. The question this time is, how many of the yoots will get out and vote. They will be the determining factor this time, and they won’t be voting McCain.
Unfortunately for them, their “hateHillary” cover is over, and they now must defend Hussein.
The Yute vote isn’t on Obama’s page. It is on Shepherd Fairey’s street warfare poster page. It is on Myspace. It is at the summer “rawk” festivals. It is on SeeBS-Viacommie’s MTV (where they LIED to kids in 2004 and claimed that Bush was going to bring back the draft DESPITE the only legislation to do so was entirely sponsored by Democrats in the House and Senate).
Obama is the first campaign on record to support illegal vandalism to "get the message out"
This graffiti is NOT by Shepherd Fairey but it is ALL street warfare propaganda:
This IS by Fairey and appears to be posted (illegally?) outdoors:
Was there a band? A DJ? A celebrity to bring out the crowds for Obama?
They don’t always get press because the Golden Child doesn’t like to admit he has help bringing out the people.
Someone to rally the troops.
ALL of the candidates have a presence on Myspace. They don’t all get the same attention there.
And his staff was backed by Deaniacs so I suspect a half-hearted effort at best to actually see him win (they just wanted McCain to lock out the conservatives, a job they accomplished).
He has had at least one public resignation by someone who said that he’d be backing Obama in the Fall election.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.