Posted on 06/17/2008 9:06:07 AM PDT by JRochelle
A runaway metaphor is not the worst sin in the world. But if former Navy Secretary Richard Danzig really is a potential national security adviser under President Obama, he's doing his potential future boss no favors when he talks like this:
Richard Danzig, who served as Navy Secretary under President Clinton and is tipped to become National Security Adviser in an Obama White House, told a major foreign policy conference in Washington that the future of US strategy in the war on terrorism should follow a lesson from the pages of Winnie the Pooh, which can be shortened to: if it is causing you too much pain, try something else.
Mr Danzig told the Centre for New American Security: “Winnie the Pooh seems to me to be a fundamental text on national security.”
He spelt out how American troops, spies and anti-terrorist officials could learn key lessons by understanding the desire of terrorists to emulate superheroes like Luke Skywalker, and the lust for violence of violent football fans.
(Lest anyone suspect that the Telegraph is exaggerating Danzig's role in the campaign, note Obama called Danzig "one of our key foreign policy advisers" in November 2007.) The best explanation of the metaphor in the article comes here:
Mr Danzig spelt out the need to change by reading a paragraph from chapter one of the children’s classic, which says: “Here is Edward Bear, coming downstairs now, bump, bump, bump on the back of his head behind Christopher Robin. It is, as far as he knows, the only way of coming down stairs. But sometimes he thinks there really is another way if only he could stop bumping a minute and think about it.”
(So in the Danzig/Obama foreign policy vision... who's Tigger? We know Piglet has already been banned from the metaphor out of sensitivity to Muslims. Apparently Sen. Harry "the war is lost" Reid is Eeyore under this scenario.)
Jen Rubin suggests "Obama get rid of advisors who make people wonder if he is really ready to sit at the grown-up’s table." We've already seen Obama defend his summits-anytime-anywhere-with-anyone policy by pointing out that Iran, Venezuela and Cuba are geographically tiny, a strikingly irrelevant piece of data in a world of asymmetrical threats.
It's good that Obama is going to Iraq and Afghanistan. And he would be wise to articulate a national security policy that relied more on personal meetings with Gen. David Petraeus and less on reading Winnie the Pooh.
Obama's 'Key' Foreign Policy Adviser: “Winnie the Pooh seems to me to be a fundamental text on national security.”
Channelling Admiral Stockdale?
May he RIP.
...and this is not Scrappleface?
Sadly it is all too real.
And we’d all be speaking German....(No offense to Germans goes without saying)
Sadder still is that the Soros-soaked sheeple will find such tripe to be "true enlightenment" as we seek change in our diplomatic dealings with the rest of the world.
He was SecNav when the Cole was struck.
OOPS - “she” should be “he”
Just read part of the “heffalump trap” story to my 3 yr old.
Pooh and Piglet fall into a pit trap that they think a heffalump set to capture them. Pooh tells piglet how he’ll handle it when the heffalump comes to get them.
Basically, when the heffalump triumphantly proclaims his victory, Pooh will just ignore him until the heffalump becomes so disconcerted that he leaves.
Yep, sounds like how the Dhimmirats want to handle terrorist attacks.
If the Obamaites are going to start using fictional characters for foreign policy metaphors, I wish they’d start reading the old Jack Armstrong, the All-American Boy transcripts from wartime radio.
Hey, if your political world is no deeper than a bumper sticker anyway, Pooh has to sound pretty profound. I’d humbly suggest to Danzig that instead of the troops learning about terrorists from Pooh, that he learn about terrorists from the troops. But that’s just me...
Oh, bother.........
Good grief, could he really be that stupid?
(rhetorical question)
I’m at a loss for words...
Even the phrase “Houston we have a problem” is lame.........
And we’d all be speaking German....(No offense to Germans goes without saying)
nah, german seems appropriate
after all, germans in 1932 faced the same dilemma: elect a senile, has-been war hero or a racist, fanatical extremist who was bent on pursuing his destructive policies at whatever the cost to his own people. it turned out not to matter in the end.
This is not the former Navy Secretary Richard Danzig I knew?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.