Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Remember Those Iraqi Benchmarks? Well, Guess What…
Pajamas Media ^ | June 17, 2008 | Abe Greenwald

Posted on 06/17/2008 10:47:49 AM PDT by george76

Democrats no longer talk of the 18 benchmarks for measuring progress in Iraq because so much progress has now taken place.

Way back in the dark days of 2007, when the only popular question about the Iraq war concerned the degree of tragedy, Congress’s Iraq “benchmarks” were all the rage among Democrats. Every argument against a continued U.S. presence in Iraq was constructed around the Maliki administration’s apparent inability to meet the political and security-based milestones as outlined by America’s Democratic-majority Congress.

Then something happened. The gains of the troop surge allowed the Iraqi government and citizenry to implement the security measures and legislative acts called for by the U.S. The benchmark line of argument quietly died. Here, then, is the brief life and glorious death of the great benchmark trope.

In mid-May 2007, Congress passed bill H.R. 2206, which included 18 benchmarks intended to gauge success in the security and political reconciliation of Iraq. Some of the benchmarks were broadly worded calls for beefed-up security, while others cited very specific goals.

Petraeus defanged anti-war Democrats by calling for a troop drawdown starting mid-2008. Because Petraeus had realized that benchmarks weren’t the most useful metric ...

Well, if the benchmarks were all-important to Democrats in the fall of 2007, they have become meaningless to them in 2008. When is the last time you’ve heard a benchmark reckoning from Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi? The reason for the deafening silence on this matter is simple. The military and political progress in Iraq has proved so monumental that the majority of the benchmarks have now been met.

(Excerpt) Read more at pajamasmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: benchmarks; democrats; iraq; iraqsurge; petraeus; progress; rebuildingiraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 06/17/2008 10:47:50 AM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; jazusamo; elhombrelibre; LucyT

Robbed of their benchmark-rage


2 posted on 06/17/2008 10:49:40 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
I guess it's time for the Democrats and MSM to bring out of the closet the good old lies " NO BLOOD FOR OIL " opps, that won't work, if it was true, oil would be cheaper now.... 2nd lie, " Bush lied and people died " ,,, opps, that won't work, more and more proof and intell coming out that we had a good reason to go into Iraq, and the WMDs were moved....
I guess the Democrats and MSM are running out of lies.....
3 posted on 06/17/2008 10:55:57 AM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76

The U. S. media has an agenda that has nothing to do with reporting the “news”. One of the lead stories in all forms of media for the past few days was about gays marrying in California. Now, seriously, who really cares?


4 posted on 06/17/2008 10:56:00 AM PDT by chickadee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

That shuffling noise in the background is the sound of Goal Posts being moved...


5 posted on 06/17/2008 10:57:10 AM PDT by Tallguy (Tagline is offline till something better comes along...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Not that anyone is going to know about it.


6 posted on 06/17/2008 10:57:51 AM PDT by Lady Jag (Donate to FR anytime at https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
Making a grocery list??...But you don't Eat in order that the food was bought.

In fact, that roast....the big one might be better left for the future.

7 posted on 06/17/2008 10:58:08 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76

bump


8 posted on 06/17/2008 11:01:03 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

This does not matter, the media will ignore it, and the dems will just think of an obscure negative from the situation and focus on it. Yet again, it will be pushed to the side to the tune of “Democrats are all knowing and infallable”. What’s the point of all of this when it’s ignored all of the time?


9 posted on 06/17/2008 11:01:09 AM PDT by cups
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness

They will never run out of lies or people willing to believe them.


10 posted on 06/17/2008 11:02:33 AM PDT by Uriah_lost (Do you have your "bug out" plan ready?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: george76; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
The gains of the troop surge allowed the Iraqi government and citizenry to implement the security measures and legislative acts called for by the U.S. The benchmark line of argument quietly died... In mid-May 2007, Congress passed bill H.R. 2206, which included 18 benchmarks intended to gauge success in the security and political reconciliation of Iraq. Some of the benchmarks were broadly worded calls for beefed-up security, while others cited very specific goals... if the benchmarks were all-important to Democrats in the fall of 2007, they have become meaningless to them in 2008. When is the last time you’ve heard a benchmark reckoning from Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi? The reason for the deafening silence on this matter is simple. The military and political progress in Iraq has proved so monumental that the majority of the benchmarks have now been met.
The surge? Oh yeah... President Bush ordered that not long after the 2006 election, when he became a Lame Duck. Lucky for the Demwits that he's so weak. ;') Thanks geo.
11 posted on 06/17/2008 11:06:27 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_________________________Profile updated Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cups

The point is, *we* know it. The Demwits rely on the stupidity and credulousness of their small core of supporters and their partisan media shills, but that party is in the minority and has been for a long time.


12 posted on 06/17/2008 11:09:31 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_________________________Profile updated Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness

bttt


13 posted on 06/17/2008 11:10:25 AM PDT by petercooper (It's called subprime for a reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: george76

bttt


14 posted on 06/17/2008 11:18:11 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("As the elect of God, holy and beloved, put on tender mercies, kindness, humility, and meekness.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Harry Reid’s benchmark is on his backside!


15 posted on 06/17/2008 12:09:42 PM PDT by FlashBack (www.proudpatriots.org/www.woundedwarriorproject.org/www.moveamericaforward.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
For the sake of history, it should also be noted that the strategic purpose of the Iraq campaign is also very close to being realized:

1. Destroy SH and gain a new Iraq as an ally in the region
2. Get SA and other ME countries on board in the WOT
3. Undermine terror funding from ME.
4. Marginalize or co-op Syria and Iran and get everyone else, like Jordan and Pakistan, more fully behind the WOT.
5. Drain the swamp of poverty, humiliation and western blame that feeds terror recruiting and funding.
6. Destroy open AND covert state support for terror.

16 posted on 06/17/2008 12:21:43 PM PDT by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; FARS; Ernest_at_the_Beach; knighthawk; Marine_Uncle; SandRat; Steel Wolf; CAP; ...

Iraq ping.


17 posted on 06/17/2008 12:35:59 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Obama is al Qaeda's only hope in Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76

Bookmark! Thanks for the good news!


18 posted on 06/17/2008 12:38:46 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (http://www.iraqvetsforcongress.com ---- Get involved, make a difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre; SunkenCiv; NormsRevenge; Allegra; SandRat; tobyhill; G8 Diplomat; Dog; Cap Huff; ...
Adding to the ping blitz....more good news....

Earlier news:

MILITARY: Charges against Haditha battalion commander dropped

19 posted on 06/17/2008 12:43:00 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness
Their next attack was on the Long-term security pact (SOFA) but there is news there also....FR thread:

US-Iraq security pact 'not dead,' deal ready in July: Iraqi FM ( Hoshyar Zebari )

20 posted on 06/17/2008 12:48:14 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson