Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EdLake
The New York Times joined in, and the campaign went on for SIX MONTHS
before Van Harp at the FBI caved in and began the public
investigation of Dr. Hatfill.


Hopefully, Van Harp's folding will be a prime case-study for
young FBI trainees.
To show them how FBI assets can be wasted (and how much money
it can cost) when FBI investigations are guided by academicians
and hack journalists.

It's something to ponder: how many true "bad actors" got away
while all those FBI resources were being used to dog Hatfill.

As for Hatfill, Dubya should give him The Medal of Freedom.
For not cracking under the unrelenting pressure of The FBI,
The New York Times, and a crank professor.
21 posted on 06/28/2008 8:27:46 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: VOA
Hopefully, Van Harp's folding will be a prime case-study for young FBI trainees.

Yes, there are LOTS of lessons to be learned from this.

People endlessly blame the FBI, but the facts show that the leaking of information about Dr. Hatill was mostly done by lawyers in the Department of Justice. Attorney General Ashcroft's improper statements that Dr. Hatfill was a "person of interest" didn't come from the FBI. It was a statement from the head of the DOJ.

Hidden withing ZACKandPOOK's endless post is information which shows that the FBI tried to stop the leaks by stopping the leakers. In one case, they caused the "leak" of ridiculously FALSE information that bloodhounds had gotten Dr. Hatfill's scent off the anthrax letters. They told it in confidence to the top lawyer in the Washington Office of the DOJ, and that lawyer promptly leaked it to Newsweek. That lawyer is now out of the DOJ.

But I think it's also important to realize that the Hatfill case almost certainly needed to be resolved before the FBI could arrest the actual culprit. If they didn't, they'd have to stand up in court in the Hatfill lawsuit and explain why they harrassed Dr. Hatfill while they were all but certain that someone else was the culprit.

There are lots of lessons to be learned here, and it isn't yet over. Hatfill's appeal in his lawsuit against the New York Times is still pending.

And, of course, the actual culprit still hasn't been arrested.

Ed at www.anthraxinvestigation.com

22 posted on 06/28/2008 8:50:18 AM PDT by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson