Replies

As usual, the great Cliff Kincaid of Accuracy in Media nails it, as he did in this case right from the beginning.

FWIW, Kincaid started talking about Dr. Hatfill being innocent on August 20, 2002.

I was saying the same thing -- for better reasons -- on August 12.

And kudos to you for getting it right so early, sir.

Journalist/blogger Nicholas Stix seems to have had it right back as early as July 22 of '02. Here's a thread from way back then.

There's a longtime Freeper regular here whose handle I won't mention who incredibly STILL believes that Hatfill was involved. He's annoying me with personal e-mails to tell me "it's not over yet, you just wait and see." Yet he won't openly and directly say so any more in any of these threads, which I know he's reading, because he posts here all the time.