Maybe Mahmoud and Barry can develop a relationship like Larry and Barry.
1 posted on
07/02/2008 6:07:07 PM PDT by
pissant
To: All
2 posted on
07/02/2008 6:08:16 PM PDT by
Cindy
To: pissant
Oddly enough, he was quite the darling of the anti-War wingnuts during the primaries.
Oh well, under the bus with the rest.
3 posted on
07/02/2008 6:09:24 PM PDT by
A Balrog of Morgoth
(QMC(SW) USN........ CG21 DD988 FFG34 PC6 ARS53)
To: pissant
I wonder what the Israelis think about THAT....
5 posted on
07/02/2008 6:11:19 PM PDT by
traumer
To: pissant
Obama: “So Mahmoud... Tell me why you want to wipe Israel off the map. Maybe we can discover some common ground.”
6 posted on
07/02/2008 6:22:01 PM PDT by
Brilliant
To: pissant
Anthony Lake...former protege of Henry Kissinger and Nixon, former Director of Policy Planning under Jimmah Cahrter, was National Security Advisor to Bill Clinkstone, was Prof at Mount Holyoke College and taught on the Vietnam War, Third World Revolutions, and American Foreign Policy..Once stated that he was not sure if Alger Hiss was guilty..which may have cost him a nomination as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency..
Yep, that’s just the type of loser Obama would pick as a foreign affairs consultant..”Revolutions”..ahh...makes a dimRATS heart beat faster...
7 posted on
07/02/2008 6:33:44 PM PDT by
billmor
(The American Voter--the Sleeping Tiger. Kicked in the back end.)
To: pissant
Ah, dialogue with Iran...I just heard Medea Code Pink say the same thing on The Factor. Must be this week’s talking point.
9 posted on
07/02/2008 6:38:21 PM PDT by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
To: pissant
To: pissant
Obama and his advisers, such as Lake, have stressed the Democratic candidate's readiness to sit down with Iranian leaders without conditions. The Iranians are experts at playing "friends" and enemies off against each other while baiting the Russians and Chinese with the idea of oil(before their production capacity reaches zero). The will get as many goodies as they can from Lake and his boss, Obama. Then, having perfected their nuclear weapons, they will have a surrogate eliminate most of the Israelis. Israel doesn't have the nonnuclear capacity to eliminate the threat.
11 posted on
07/02/2008 7:48:25 PM PDT by
JimSEA
(Kaffur and proud of it.)
To: pissant
...would maintain "a residual presence for clearly defined missions."Oh I see. So Obama wouldn't REALLY get us out of Iraq. He would draw down the forces according to what commanders would tell him is necessary and of course if they told him they needed more to insure security Obama would put some back in. It sounds an awful lot like...it's so familiar to me...the Bush policy?
Captain Empty Suit strikes again!
12 posted on
07/02/2008 9:20:13 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(Berlin '36 Olympics for murdering regimes Beijing '08)
...In November 1970, President Nixon asked the U.S. Congress to provide the Cambodian government of Lon Nol with $155 million in aid, of which $85 million would be earmarked for military assistance to help prevent the Khmer Rouge from taking power. American leftists, however, were adamantly against this proposal. One opponent of the policy was Anthony Lake, who in 1969 had become an aide to then-Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, but who because he opposed Nixons bombing raids (designed to support Lon Nol against Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge) in Cambodia soon parted political company with Kissinger and the President. By 1972 [Anthony] Lake was an activist in the McGovern presidential campaign, whose platform was founded upon the axiom that the military conflicts of Southeast Asia were rooted in the "arrogance of American power" rather than in Communist aggression.[10]... --------"Left-Wing Monster: Pol Pot ," by John Perazzo, Front Page Magazine ^ | August 8, 2005 |
13 posted on
01/12/2009 1:23:55 AM PST by
piasa
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson