That reminds me... when are Conservatives finally going to have their own news channel ?
10 years ago, anything “Clintonian” at FreeRepublic would have continued to impact individual and national health. Big time.
Additionally, I would bet that many here would now vote FOX a liberal news network. Easily.
Just another talking-head.
FOX is headed leftward anyway.
Too bad. FNC used to be about the only watchable news media outlet for conservatives.
But that’s gone away. No big loss, I don’t watch any news shows anyway.
Too many Leftist Liberals on Fox.
Fox is starting to sound like any other trash network.
The NYT just never quits:
~snip~
But he will certainly forward its message on the network, which appeals to more conservative, independent, white voters Mr. Obama is trying to court.
~snip~
White voters. But are they typical?
Lanny Davis is now called “a FOX contributor” when he makes one of his 500 appearances a week. Everytime he comes on, all I can think of is Elvis with a weapon and a supply of TVs to be shot at.
This Clinton weasel is also on the payroll at FOX.
However, do not mistaken it and think that they are fair and balanced. They still lean to the left. Just not as heavy as CNN, MSNBC, and the old dinosaurs.
Next they can bring on board Mandy Grunwald, Sid Bluementhal, John Podesta, and Bruce Lindsay for more democRAT Shilling.
Interesting hire....but I keep checking in at cnn for Tony Snow....anyone know how he is doing and when he will be on?
It a huge audience soon to be dwindeling because it's gives face time to idiots like "progessive" Wolfson...
Fox, let me remind you that "fair and balance" doesn't mean promoting wacked out lies and liars just to give credence to the phrase!
This isn’t the Fox I knew...
EWWWWWWWWWWW! This is an immediate channel change! I can't image why they would want this loser. Their latest choices for "contributors" are the reason I ONLY watch the panel with Brit Hume. It was originally a good alternative to the MSM. Now it has become just an echo of the MSM while trying to be "fair and balanced". This makes it even worse!
I love to hear Rove on Fox but he generally has no one to debate. I think if Wolfson and Rove go head to head Rove wins because he articulates the Conservative position so well (and he’s always right!). There’s no need to fear the opposing view as long as there is someone on to refute it.
Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer.
Sun-tzu
Chinese general & military strategist (~400 BC)
What I used to like about FoxNews is that is was the balance (as Rush often says). Instead of patsies that other networks called ‘Conservatives’, Fox actually used Conservatives that could shut down Liberal arguments. And I like the use of Libs that aren’t just patsies to do it.
But the place is becoming overrun with Clintonistas. It’s one thing to present the Liberal argument in a coherent and compelling way (think Mayor Ed Koch), it’s another to provide haven for destroyers of America.
Sigh, I presume Fox and Co are looking for a way to give the Clintonistas a perch from which they can swoop down and peck at Obama. It may sell ads but it has nothing to do with “fair and balanced.”
How “fair” of Fox to give exposure to another American hating leftist KKKlintonoid. After all, there are so FEW of them on the air that we never hear their point of view on other channels. Seriously, all this does is dilute the already thin layer of conservatism on Fox. This is another example of a Fox caring more about what its competitors say about it than beating them into bankrupcy.
Why is it necessary for the networks to hire professional political shills to spread propaganda to their viewers? What’s the difference between so-called “news programs” and the campaigns they’re supposed to cover? I guess journalism is a thing of the past.
Wolfson reminds me of Roy Cohn.