To: NormsRevenge; elhombrelibre; Allegra; SandRat; tobyhill; G8 Diplomat; Dog; Cap Huff; ...
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It is 5 minutes to midnight according to the doomsday clock, but it seems to rank climate change and carbon footprints right up there with a nuclear Iran. When Algore runs the doomsday clock, it begins to lose its meaning.
5 posted on
07/12/2008 10:04:19 AM PDT by
Sender
(Never lose your ignorance; you can never regain it!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This week Iran tested its first nuclear-capable, long-range missile and moved the hands of the Doomsday Clock a little closer to disaster.
If Obama gets elected, it'll move even closer to disaster. 11:04:08 -- hey, that IS pretty close to midnight! Lol
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Remember the days when these sorts of things were presumed to have integrity? These days people are willing to boldly and obviously lie about the color of the sky if it suits their agenda.
|
|
|
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Bulletin of Atomic Scientists These are not Atomic Scientists and should be ignored.
8 posted on
07/12/2008 11:36:08 AM PDT by
RightWhale
(I will veto each and every beer)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
We’re not dealing with rational people.
Iran is a problem that needs to be eliminated-asap.I’m inclined to believe if they acquire or are able to develop their own nukes-they’ll use them.I don’t think they appreciate the concept of “mutually assured destruction”.
11 posted on
07/12/2008 1:27:50 PM PDT by
Thombo2
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The Doomsday Scenario A Nuclear Iran?Doomsday for Iran, perhaps.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson