To: Sub-Driver
Good. The purpose of the legislation was not for the US government to sell it off ... or use it in time of trouble. It’s a ‘STRATEGIC’ reserve, was meant to US military and national defense ... not gain political points.
2 posted on
07/24/2008 12:15:15 PM PDT by
K-oneTexas
(I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
To: K-oneTexas
Its a STRATEGIC reserve, was meant to US military and national defense ... not gain political points.
—
or cover the butts of the dems who are majorly negligent in this energy debacle we are paying for at the pumps.
They should think twice when they cash environuts checks.. and do their bidding.. and what it costs all of us.
6 posted on
07/24/2008 12:22:43 PM PDT by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE toll-free tip hotline 1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRget!!!)
To: K-oneTexas
The Democrats bring up selling off the Strategic Petroleum Reserve at every opportunity...
...because they want us ripe for conquest.
"... the great question of our time is not whether or not one world can be achieved, but whether or not one world can be achieved by peaceful means. We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest." James Warburg, in testimony to Congress.
Gosh, I wonder how they would do that? /s
18 posted on
07/24/2008 12:52:35 PM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(G-d gave us Law a fool could follow, but a genius couldn't comprehend)
To: K-oneTexas
I agree. I do wonder about what winter will bring for those who heat with oil. At current level, I'm looking at a cost of between $5000 to $6000 for the winter.
25 posted on
07/24/2008 2:09:52 PM PDT by
isrul
(Help make every day, "Disrespect a muzzie day.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson