Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

They Got The House For Free--And We STILL Have To Bail Them Out!
Boston Herald ^ | July 29, 2008 | Michael Graham

Posted on 07/29/2008 3:55:16 AM PDT by suspects

Call it the “Extreme Rake-Over: Taxpayer Edition.”

Three years ago, Patricia and Milton Harper were handed the keys to their brand-new, 4BR dream home on ABC-TV. When Ty Pennington handed them the keys, he also gave the Harpers $250,000 to cover taxes and maintenance for the next 25 years.

Three years later, the home is in foreclosure and scheduled for auction - another “casualty” of the mortgage crisis.

A free house, a sack of dough, and the Harpers still managed to get $450,000 in debt and lose their home? They are the poster couple for the $300 billion mortgage bailout plan.

According to neighbors, the couple borrowed a lot to start a business but - as one delicately put it - “they were never good with money.”

We all know people like that. Heck, during my misspent youth I was a person like that. But that doesn’t fit the media’s narrative for the government bailout plan.

No, according to the mainstream media, responsible citizens were sitting in their bungalows, clipping coupons and knitting their own clothing, when they were set upon by Wall Street sharks and sleazy mortgage sellers who duped poor Ma and Pa into buying a McMansion they couldn’t afford. And now these solid citizens are being tossed into the gutter by greedy banks and a heartless Bush administration.

That’s certainly how The Boston Globe-Democrat told the story of “Taunton mother Carlene Balderrama.” In the Globe-Democrat’s version, Balderrama “killed herself an hour and a half before her home had been scheduled to go up for foreclosure auction.” She died of shame, the paper suggested, having hidden the foreclosure notices from her husband.

“What gets us so angry is that people blame themselves,” said Boston housing activist Bruce Marks. “They can’t see past their sense of responsibility..."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.bostonherald.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: bailout; extrememakeover; housing; michaelgraham; mortgage; responsibility
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 07/29/2008 3:55:16 AM PDT by suspects
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: suspects

I agree. Let the homes go. Of course, the mortage lenders will go belly up too, which is what this is really about.


2 posted on 07/29/2008 4:06:24 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: suspects

The mortgage crisis/bail out reminds me of that cable show Clean House. They find people who live in unfathomable clutter, help them clean out the clutter, hold a garage sale, raise funds, then they redo the house to be beautifully decorated, organized, and neat as a pin.

I always wonder how long it will take for the house to revert to it’s clutter ridden state, because they really didn’t solve the problem, which is the people’s propensity for keeping junk.

The mortgage bailout is the same thing, it doesn’t solve these folks problems. They took on more debt than they could handle before, they’ll do it again.


4 posted on 07/29/2008 4:12:07 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

They’ll do it again BECAUSE they suffered no ill-effects this time.


5 posted on 07/29/2008 4:15:00 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: suspects

[“They can’t see past their sense of responsibility...”]

Bull, they can’t see as far as their responsibility. And it is right up front in the line.


6 posted on 07/29/2008 4:27:25 AM PDT by dbacks (Should we really elect a man that would not be allowed to be an airport baggage screener?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD

Michael Graham PING!


7 posted on 07/29/2008 4:34:42 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suspects
Let Ty Pennington do it AGAIN.. again and again.. till he learns his lesson..
The TV SHow has lots of money..

Capitalism creates wealth, Socialism USES that wealth UP..
Question: Is there such a thing as a FREE LUNCH?...

8 posted on 07/29/2008 4:50:29 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suspects; Virginia Ridgerunner

Great column, Michael!

ABC-TV should’ve bought this house for these people or bailed them out. Or perhaps they could’ve created another reality series, like “Extreme Bailout” or “Mortgage Mayhem” or “Are You Smarter Than a Mortgage Lender?” or “Who Wants To Be A Foreclosure Freak?” , etc.


9 posted on 07/29/2008 4:54:29 AM PDT by SilvieWaldorfMD (Airlines can take their $15-per-checked-bag surcharge and shove it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

I agree. Let the homes go. Of course, the mortage lenders will go belly up too, which is what this is really about.


The mortgage lenders aren’t owed any money. They sold the paper long ago to banks, municipalities, unions, hedge funds, and anyone else willing to buy.


10 posted on 07/29/2008 4:56:00 AM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: suspects

The only time I have watched that show, they built a new house for a disabled Marine and his 3 kids, no wife in the picture. I thought it was a pretty good deal then.


11 posted on 07/29/2008 4:58:58 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (I'm voting for McCain because he's white - credit Jeff Chandler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suspects
These people won't be happy until we GIVE them an expensive new house, 40 acres, a mule, an Escalade or two with low-pros and spinners, gold teeth (one at a time), $200-plus jeans, tickets to see Fatty G (or some other similarly named thug-idiot man-child), and on and on and on...

and EVEN then, it wouldn't be enough.

They want to be bailed out for their STUPID, IGNORANT choices.

Enough is enough.

12 posted on 07/29/2008 4:59:46 AM PDT by DocH (hussein and juan - what kind of choice is THAT? God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sf4dubya

A family here bought a second higher end home and simply walked from the first home. They could have sold the house but didn’t even try.


13 posted on 07/29/2008 5:19:23 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: suspects

This is one of the worse bills to ever come out of DC.


14 posted on 07/29/2008 5:20:08 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suspects
Here is a photo of the lucky family before they blew the $250,000 meant for taxes, maintenance, etc.

"Send more money!"

15 posted on 07/29/2008 5:29:02 AM PDT by capt. norm (Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suspects
I have to say that I believe this mess is a combination of ignorant buyers and greedy lenders.

My Hubby and I are an older couple. We were looking to buy in early 2000 and 2001. We looked over our budget, figured out what we could afford and started looking. We were approved by 2 mortgage lenders for $100,000 MORE than we were comfortable spending. Competition for lower priced housing was fierce and we lost. The mortgage companies pushed us to look at higher priced houses that we felt we couldn't afford. They told us REPEATEDLY that we COULD afford it. One man got so angry when I asserted that we couldn't handle a higher mortgage that he hung up on me.

Considering this I have to say that lenders were pushy and handing out mortgages like free candy. Buyers that hadn't figured out how to budget and stick to it bought the line "You can afford it".

16 posted on 07/29/2008 5:30:11 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW ("Make yourself sheep, and the wolves will eat you" Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
I agree with you assessment about the ignorant buyers and greedy lenders, but should responsible with common sense have to bail them out? Free market capitalism allows people to succeed as well as fail in economic ventures. Socilaism tends to subsidize stupidity and failure.
17 posted on 07/29/2008 5:52:13 AM PDT by Col. Bob (To give in is to commit national suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
The only time I have watched that show, they built a new house for a disabled Marine and his 3 kids, no wife in the picture. I thought it was a pretty good deal then.

I agree and will take it a step further. I think that the show and what they do is a terrific thing. I've seen references to "socialism" mentioned here, but this is NOTHING like socialism. The government is NOT involved. A number of private companies and individuals give time and materials to do something wonderful for someone who's been nominated by the community. Here in KC, EMHE has been here 3 times over the years. All 3 families were barely making ends meet, and the show gave them something that they'd never be able to earn for themselves - and would probably never try to earn for themselves either. I can't say how they've done in the long run, but I refuse to condemn the concept or the results because of one heavily reported bad experience... And might there be some reason for trying to smear the show? Maybe having something to do with the idea that only government can "really" help people. Charitable acts are simply a waste of time.

Mark

18 posted on 07/29/2008 5:57:11 AM PDT by MarkL (Al Gore: The Greenhouse Gasbag! (heard on Bob Brinker's Money Talk))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Col. Bob
but should responsible with common sense have to bail them out?

Absolutely not.

We will never own our own home now because we were smarter than going in debt over our heads. Why should we bail out someone who was ignorant and did no research or budgeting and greedy lenders? We shouldn't.

My response was to those who wish to blame just buyers or lenders when it was both that were stupid.

Socilaism tends to subsidize stupidity and failure.

You bet. :)

19 posted on 07/29/2008 6:00:46 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW ("Make yourself sheep, and the wolves will eat you" Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Col. Bob; DJ MacWoW

If it were just a handful of folks, I would agree with your assessment. But it’s not just a few people — it’s hundreds of thousands. And their debt has infected the entire economy.


20 posted on 07/29/2008 6:06:25 AM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson