To: Cincinatus
Look, Cook and Nelson ... just because you were
there with first hand, eye witness knowledge, doesn't mean you actually
know anything!
We needed algore and his internet to set us, and historical fact straight.
Nice try guys, but I'm stickin' with the Minister of the Planet on this one.
13 posted on
08/04/2008 4:06:07 AM PDT by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
To: knarf
Look, Cook and Nelson ... just because you were there with first hand, eye witness knowledge, doesn't mean you actually know anything! According to postmodernism, no one can know anything and the observations of Cook, etc. are just meaningless words on paper. The postmodernists also say that contemporary scientific observations are meaningless because, well, just because. About the only things we can believe are the words of Marx and his junior disciple, Al Gore.
21 posted on
08/04/2008 5:02:00 AM PDT by
Wilhelm Tell
(True or False? This is not a tag line.)
To: knarf
Anthrogenic Global Warming Theory is quite robust with respect to data. All observations confirm it with probability 1.0.
Once the IPCC gets done torturing these data they’ll confess to anything, including AGW in the first degree.
23 posted on
08/04/2008 5:19:36 AM PDT by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(His Negritude has made his negritude the central theme of this campaign)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson