Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alter Kaker
Darwin read a paper by Wallace, a quick sketch of the theory, and decided to step up publication of On the Origin of the Species to avoid getting scooped. If Darwin had plagiarized Wallace, he would have had to have written the book in about 15 minutes.

Yes, yes... that what it was. Darwin said so himself I'm sure...

18 posted on 08/11/2008 3:39:59 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: AmericaUnited
Yes, yes... that what it was. Darwin said so himself I'm sure...

Well Alfred Russel Wallace certainly never accused Darwin of plagiarizing -- and the two spent decades collaborating after On the Origin of the Species.

Don't you think he just might have said something? The fact of the matter is that Russel stumbled on the outlines of the theory. However, Darwin's Origin of the Species is far more sophisticated and fleshed out than what Wallace had been working with. At least Wallace himself seemed to have thought so... but what did he know!

20 posted on 08/11/2008 3:45:42 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson