Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Perata says he has budget deal with Schwarzenegger, needs GOP votes (including "spending cap")
Sac Bee ^ | 8/13/08 | Jim Sanders

Posted on 08/13/2008 11:37:52 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

Senate President Pro Tem Don Perata said today that Democrats have negotiated key points of a compromise state budget with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and that he considers negotiations over.

"I think we've, frankly, gone about as far as we can go," the Oakland Democrat said.

Perata said the compromise plan includes a major concession by Democrats - a spending cap to limit annual state expenditures.

Republicans have been insisting on a spending cap as part of any budget pact.

"The question continues to be, are there Republican votes for it?" Perata said of the compromise plan.

The ball is in Schwarzenegger's court, he suggested.

"A Republican governor should have some sway over Republicans," he said.

Other key elements of the compromise plan include a temporary 1-cent increase in the state sales tax and a rainy-day fund to sock money away in boom years.

Perata did not elaborate on details of the proposed spending cap, but said it was intended to break the current standoff with Republicans.

"We've said to the governor, 'What do you need in order to move forward?' So we've negotiated on that point," Perata said.

"I'll guarantee you that there won't be anybody in the house that's going to be happy with the conclusion. But it is a compromise - new revenues and program cuts, and no borrowing."

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: budgetdeal; calbudget; california; govwatch; norepublicangovernor; perata; postpartisanship; schwarzenegger

1 posted on 08/13/2008 11:37:52 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Pay no attention to the sales tax hike “temporary” of course, and forget offshore drilling.. the spirit of Bozo lives on ..


2 posted on 08/13/2008 11:40:56 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE toll-free tip hotline 1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRget!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“a temporary 1-cent increase in the state sales tax”

Temporary?....Yeah, riiiight!!!!


3 posted on 08/13/2008 11:44:23 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Any real spending cuts?


4 posted on 08/13/2008 11:46:33 AM PDT by jrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The socialists and Marxists are in control here in California.


5 posted on 08/13/2008 11:47:27 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrp

Nope but watch the positive spin on the spending cap...

The spending cap is suppose to be the revenue received. Our Constitution states the government must have a balanced budget, i.e. no more spending then income coming in.

Arnold is about as popular as cold weather here and is just giving up his leadership role as Governor to the leftist running the senate.


6 posted on 08/13/2008 11:51:10 AM PDT by edcoil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
...Perata said the compromise plan includes a major concession by Democrats - a spending cap to limit annual state expenditures...

Oh great, we get to repeat the Lucy/Charlie Brown kicking the football experience...
Unless we actually cut/eliminate programs and government functions that shouldn't exist (which is probably 1/2 of what they do) -- this is all smoke and mirrors.
Promise them anything - and give them a pez...

7 posted on 08/13/2008 11:51:40 AM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

“The socialists and Marxists are in control here in California.”

And you are surprised by this?? ;-)

Hmm - why aren’t we going to have to vote on the “Temporary” sales tax increase? Isn’t this covered by Prop 13 requirements????


8 posted on 08/13/2008 11:54:31 AM PDT by fremont_steve (Milpitas - a great place to be FROM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"A Republican governor should have some sway over Republicans," he said.

True, but California has a Girly-Man liberal Democrat as Gov.

9 posted on 08/13/2008 11:55:56 AM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrp

Not really. They did most of their series paring “to the bone” last go around, they are running on vapors here..

It’s either tax a bunch or borrow which they already have done too much or crash..

Of course all the smoke mand mirrors tricks than can be tried have been or are currently in effect. Selling the lottery bombed, tribal gaming income is down, it’s hard times ahead for sure.

The state’s leaders will do all they can to spread the pain of their efforts around is about all we can be assured will come out of this latest round.


10 posted on 08/13/2008 11:58:20 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE toll-free tip hotline 1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRget!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Bwa-ha-ha-ha-haaaaaaaaaaaa. Quote of the day. ;-)
11 posted on 08/13/2008 12:03:47 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture (RINOs: the OTHER white meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Most state governments have some sort of spending cap law, and I believe the Federal government has had one since the 80s. They are toothless and nothing but a fig leaf for tax raisers.

And when will the MSM start showing some journalistic skepticm about the tax being temporary? How many times does Lucy have to yank the football?


12 posted on 08/13/2008 12:05:03 PM PDT by blue state conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
This was negotiated between the Democrats and Red Arnold. I don't think the spending cap is the kind the CAGOP is seeking. And the tax increase is objectionable on principle. Why should legislative Republicans agree to commit to vote for a "deal" to which none of them were involved in crafting?

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

13 posted on 08/13/2008 12:06:08 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture

A republican governor should have some sway...well, let us know when you elect one!


14 posted on 08/13/2008 12:08:38 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I thought a 1 cent tax increase wasn’t going to provide enough money to cover the shortfall, let alone provide money for a “rainy day fund”. So, what substantial spending cuts are being made?


15 posted on 08/13/2008 12:39:25 PM PDT by sailor4321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Assume the posiiton: bohica


16 posted on 08/13/2008 12:46:32 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Temporary like the Spanish American war long distance tax was temporary. Like 100 years temporary.


17 posted on 08/13/2008 12:52:31 PM PDT by John Jorsett (scam never sleeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"A Republican governor should have some sway over Republicans," he said.

Does California have a Republican governor? Have I been asleep? Is he the governor who is trying to save the state from climate change and the ravages of off shore oil exploration?

18 posted on 08/13/2008 12:53:33 PM PDT by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: NormsRevenge

Blood Suckahs!


20 posted on 08/13/2008 2:00:38 PM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson