Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Instant Replay Will Be Limited to Home Runs ( "Say it ain't so, Joe!" )
ESPN The Magazine ^ | August 21, 2008 | Tim Kurkjian

Posted on 08/23/2008 12:39:55 PM PDT by kellynla

Sometime soon, perhaps as early as the end of August, Major League Baseball will enter a new era, an electronic era well beyond center field cameras, radar guns and QuesTec. The era of instant replay will represent a fundamental shift in the way the game is called.

On Wednesday, MLB officials and the World Umpires Association ratified an agreement for the use of instant replay. A source close to the negotiations said an agreement between MLB and the Players Association is expected to be ratified within 48 hours. From there, it's just a matter of time before the final touches are applied to the process in hopes of having it operating in an orderly manner for the most important time of the season -- October.

"We're still working at it," said Bob DuPuy, MLB's president and chief operating officer.

The move to instant replay was hastened by a flurry of missed calls and controversial plays during a two-week period in May. Several of them came in highly visible games, including an ESPN Sunday Night game at Yankee Stadium when home plate umpire Bob Davidson overruled a home run call made by third-base umpire Mike Reilly, who had gotten the call right initially, as replays confirmed. Davidson was over 100 yards away from the play when he made the incorrect call, which, in football terms, was the equivalent of the back judge making an out-of-bounds call from one goal line to the other.

(Excerpt) Read more at sports.espn.go.com ...


TOPICS: Sports
KEYWORDS: baseball; homeruns; instantreplay; mlb
"The umpires are in favor of it. Not because we've made a lot of mistakes, but because we can't see the calls, we can't see the plays."
1 posted on 08/23/2008 12:39:56 PM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Good. Let’s start by crediting Josh Willingham with the home run the umps stole from him the other day.


2 posted on 08/23/2008 12:44:03 PM PDT by Terpfen (Romney's loss in Florida is STILL a catastrophe. Hello, McCandidate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

What will Lou Piniella do now? Kick dirt on the replay camera?


3 posted on 08/23/2008 12:47:19 PM PDT by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

The Marlins have been maybe the most affected team. While the opening day HR for the Mets was called wrong, since then there have been 5 (FIVE) going the other way.

A couple of these have been game changers too.

Baseball needs this and they need it now before someone gets really screwed.


4 posted on 08/23/2008 12:51:12 PM PDT by FlJoePa (Success without honor is an unseasoned dish; it will satisfy your hunger, but it won't taste good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
There’s no need for umpires calling balls and strikes.

With modern computers and RFID technology simply put sensors in the balls, uniforms and home plate and let the computer make the call.

5 posted on 08/23/2008 8:10:25 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
There’s no need for umpires calling balls and strikes.

Yeah, let's just get rid of umpires and turn every game into automated predictable crap.

Maybe the managers can kick dirt and curse at the Hal9000 monitoring the game.

6 posted on 08/23/2008 8:33:56 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (BARACK OBAMA WILL SAVE US! HE HAS RISEN!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

MGR: “Why you bleep bleep machine...shove it where the sun don’t shine!”

AutoUmp: “Sorry — I can’t do that Dave...”


7 posted on 08/23/2008 10:34:38 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr_Moonlight

I think Lou might want to throw a base at the camera...


8 posted on 08/28/2008 12:04:31 AM PDT by L.A.Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: L.A.Justice
I think Lou might want to throw a base at the camera...

Nomad: All your base are belong to us


9 posted on 08/28/2008 4:28:28 PM PDT by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mr_Moonlight

This Star Trek photo, I believe, is from one of my favorite episodes in which a small satellite, which was launched from 20th century Earth and was apparently floating around deep space until it met up with a superior computer which was designed by a future scientist.

The software from earth satellite, which was originally designed by NASA to analyze and eliminate microbes and bacteria, somehow blends with the software from this future computer .... and then thinks its NEW mission is to destroy anything which is not “perfect.”

Long story short, the satellite is found floating in space by the Enterprise. It thinks Capt. Kirk is the person who designed it in the first place (because the name Kirk sounds similar to that scientist’s name, which was Kirkus, or something like that).

Thus the satellite will only obey commands from Capt. Kirk.

Being indestructable, the satellite goes about attempting to kill the Enterprise and its crew because they are not “perfect”.

Kirk finally tricks the satellite into committing suicide by telling it that he (Kirk) is not perfect. This so freaks out the satellite’s software that it blows itself up.

I probably screwed up explaining the episode, but it was cool none the less.


10 posted on 08/28/2008 5:11:35 PM PDT by Edit35 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson