Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: americanophile
We'll see come Nov 4. Romney would have been a horrific choice. At least I can vote for McCain/Palin without holding my nose.
3 posted on 08/29/2008 10:36:12 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Democrats spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AlaskaErik
“We'll see come Nov 4. Romney would have been a horrific choice. At least I can vote for McCain/Palin without holding my nose.”

Romney would have been the best pick.

This article highlights the problems with Sarah.

Sarah was a tactile choice. She was picked because she is a woman. Make NO MISTAKE about that. What she can do is peak the truth about oil and the polar bears. She has possibilities but by no means is she proven. We are hopeful that she has what it takes.

Not that it matters ... but I sorely wanted Mitt. He would be the best pick but McPain felt the need to cow tow to bigoted Evangelicals who HATE Mitt because he is a Mormon. Instead of being evangelicals ... they chose bigotry over prayer for those that are not saved.

So all things considered ... I understand why McPain picked her. Make NO BONES about it Sarah was a tactile pick and what tipped it over to her was the mere fact that she is a white woman who will hopefully woo disenchanted Hitlery voters based on her gender. Sarah appears to be a good woman but if she was a guy, she'd have been passed over - it was strictly a choice made on gender - TACTILE choice. I endorse her.

61 posted on 08/29/2008 10:53:10 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: AlaskaErik
At least I can vote for McCain/Palin without holding my nose.

At last I can hold my nose and vote for McCain.

76 posted on 08/29/2008 10:56:10 AM PDT by null and void (Obama/Biden: It's a no-brainer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: AlaskaErik

I wouldn’t have voted GOP if Romney had been picked.

He’s anti-gun, saying he’d ban semi-auto guns, he changed to conservative views only when he decided to run for Pres, and he ran Mass. as a liberal, being strongly pro-homosexual.

Ed


163 posted on 08/29/2008 11:24:16 AM PDT by Sir_Ed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: AlaskaErik

Still be a good idea for McCain to formally renounce McCain/Feingold as just another failed policy of the past that should be disposed of as soon as possible.


228 posted on 08/29/2008 12:03:00 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: AlaskaErik
More sour grapes from disgruntled Romney fans. He was probably the most qualified candidate from either party, if the presidency was an appointed position. But as a politician he spent 60 milion dollars and went nowhere. He simply did not connect, with me or most anybody else. He would have been a net drag on the ticket.

I think the reactions to Palin, across the board, from conservative delight and hilaryvoters excitement, to the fuming hatred and rage of the Obama-'rat crime family, says she is a brilliant pick.

252 posted on 08/29/2008 12:27:00 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson