Obama Supported Live Birth Abortion (Infanticide), and Lied About It

IsraPundit ^ | 9/9/08 | Bill Levinson

[Winged Hussar]

...Jill Stanek reports that, while she was a registered nurse at Christ Hospital in Oak Lawn Illinois, "babies were being aborted alive and shelved to die in the soiled utility room." Barack Obama personally orchestrated the defeat of legislation that would have made this illegal in Illinois, and then he lied about it in the bargain.

...the executive summary is as follows. "Babies were being aborted alive and shelved to die in the soiled utility room." Illinois legislators introduced legislation to make this illegal. Barack Obama sabotaged and derailed this legislation under color of protecting Roe vs. Wade, even though the murder-by-neglect of a born baby takes place after the woman has exercised her right to terminate her pregnancy. When he decided to run for President, thus exposing his record to national scrutiny [he lied about it]. Here is additional information, and Jill Stanek's site is an excellent information source.

• Obama Campaign Admits Infanticide Vote Lie
  
• Obama campaign changes story, admits he misrepresented Born Alive vote
  
• Obama continues to misrepresent Born Alive vote
  
• Infanticide is an Obamanation
  
• Obama's Constitutional Crisis
  
• Obama's 10 reasons for supporting infanticide
  
• Obama caught on tape arguing against giving medical attention to aborted babies
  
• Breaking news: Obama campaign changes story, admits he misrepresented Born Alive vote
  
• Michelle Obama's partial birth abortion fundraising letter

So there we have Barack Obama: an enabler of the kind of child abuse that would normally get the perpetrator a felony criminal record and jail time, and a liar in the bargain, who is not even fit to serve in a state legislature with civilized human beings let alone the U.S. Senate.

[Winged Hussar]

You don’t have to be pro-life to oppose infanticide; you just have to be human.

We encourage our readers to copy (not link, it uses our bandwidth) and circulate the following cartoon. It is designed as a military-grade public relations image of the same type that was used to promote hatred of the enemy during the Spanish-American and World Wars, and we make no apology whatsoever for using these techniques. Sensationalistic images of this nature (if their content is truthful) are a fair and honorable way to fight genuine evil, and "babies were being aborted alive and shelved to die in the soiled utility room" is at least competitive with the evil that happened at Dachau and Auschwitz.

The following is even more graphic, and it shows Obama smashing a baby's head against a wall. The caption says he never really did this, but his orchestration of the defeat of Illinois' Born Alive Infant Protection Act had the same bottom line effect on countless abortion survivors. http://www.stentorian.com/cartoons2008/obama_abortion.jpg

If you want to know where I get these ideas, here is one of the images that the Yellow Press published to get the U.S. into the Spanish American War. It worked. In addition, while it was never proven that Spain blew up the battleship "Maine," Obama is on record as supporting live birth abortion.

Hamilton, Grant. "The Spanish Brute," lithograph, Judge, 7/9/1898 (should be in the public domain due to age)

Caption: "The Spanish Brute: Adds Mutilation to Murder."

Tombstone: "Maine Sailors Murdered by Spain"

Bodies in background: "Mutilated U.S. Soldier"

The following is from the First World War. My "Obama killing babies" images are rather mild in comparison, and they also have truthful foundations.

[GOP Poet]

So let me get this right. When it comes to when a concieved child can be considered a human being it is above Obama's pay grade. But when it comes to killing a child either in the womb or out it is his record that he has not only supported death, but constructed even more access to murder and that is by adding children that are living outside the womb.

This man is no Christian in his heart or soul. In fact this man has been so overcome by the enemy he does not even know how far off course he is. This is not a man that should be leading our country. Period.

This information needs to get out there and fast.

[GOP Poet]

I meant to say Obama added to his list, and even went so far as to construct the legal permission there of, of whom can be murdered in addition to the children in the womb—children living outside the Mother’s womb.

[FES0844]

All those who support ABORTION should be made to view this “procedure” from start to finish.
It’s murder plain & simple.

[epow]

Former Senator Zell Miller (D-GA) said it best: "I yearn for the day ... when somebody is asked what their position is on abortion, they just look right at the person who asked them and said, 'Abortion is an abomination in the eyes of God, and there's nothing in the United States Constitution that protects it,' and not just dance around, tiptoe around the issue." www.kentuckyprogress.com

If only Zell was young again and would run for president. When he was governor here in GA I never thought I would say anything like that. But after he got fed up with his party I think he would win in a landslide no matter which party he ran on, but I also think he couldn't in good conscience run on the Democrat ticket because his stated beliefs and positions on almost all major issues are 180 degrees from the Dem's platform and agenda.

[Winged Hussar]

“This information needs to get out there and fast. “

If the information were out there, Obama would not still be leading by five points in Pennsylvania.

[ChessExpert]

Obama is not consistent on a principle that is important to me. This is captured in the following two cases.

He opposes a constitutional amendment that defines marriage as between a man and a woman. I’ll paraphrase from memory. “As a Christian,” I believe marriage is between a man and a woman, and God has a place in the mix. However, this function has traditionally been left up to the states.

The problem with this appeal to tradition is that tradition does not sanction same sex marriage. A more common appeal to states’ rights is to refer to the Bill of Rights, specifically the tenth amendment. This makes sense when it comes from a true advocate of the tenth amendment.

However, Roe vs. Wade violated the tenth amendment. (That means it violated the Bill of Rights and the Constitution). An advocate of the tenth amendment, or even of simple tradition, would not advocate Roe vs. Wade.

It’s obvious that Obama has simply adopted liberal positions, and uses “tradition” and deference to the states when this gives him what he wants. To hear him speak, you might think he is applying a principle that he believes in. In fact, he is cherry picking principles at his convenience. This is an unprincipled use of principle.