Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Norman Bates

If it is a real red state, that shouldn’t make that much difference. Bush beat Gore by 25% in 2000. Montana now has two Dem senators and the Dems control the state senate [26 Dems/24 Reps] and are just one vote shy of controlling the House [50 Reps/49 Dems/1(I)]. Something is happening there.


51 posted on 09/09/2008 3:08:19 PM PDT by kabar (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: kabar

It’s all the liberal wackos that have moved there from California.

And of course, the wackiest leftist of them all, Ted Turner owns a ton of land there.


57 posted on 09/09/2008 3:16:16 PM PDT by waus (Animal House, with a slight variance: Have another beer Barry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: kabar

I think it is shifting slowly, but I’m not on the ground so I can’t imagine why. The state is more libertarian than conservative from what I gather. There’s little excuse for the kind of erosion you point out.


58 posted on 09/09/2008 3:17:06 PM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: kabar
Yes, on the local level it is a strong two party state.

I think that there are two reasons for that.

One, I think the GOP has had some ethical problems.

Two, the Democrats are pretty conservative.

On the Presidential level, the State should remain Republican especially since the Democrats have two far left liberals running for President.

80 posted on 09/09/2008 10:24:10 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration ('we don't make compromises-we make Marines')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson