Diss, diss, diss. I have never seen such a blatant absence in a potential first lady. I think Michelle is a disrespectful angry lady and doesn't have what it takes to be a first lady. She should stay home with her girls permanently as she clearly can't handle the job of first lady. She also has horrible instincts and does not have the personality type for such a job. Maybe she is angry no one really liked her at the DNC. You could just see her attitude towards nearly everyone but her Barack.
Also Barack is mismatched for the job of president. What did he do pin the tail on the donkey career choice? He is more fitting someone that can blah, blah, blah all day. Maybe a professor? He also seems quite good at following the party line and even pushing it further left in the Senate. So he probably might have a few days there as well.
The most liberal Senator. Hard to imagine the American people would want this man without the personality type for it--for president.
Poetic, Poignant, and spot on! The career path of choice for a good little socialist (found on most campuses, ACLU, law firms, etc) IS:
a student organizer, then a community organizer and then chief field organizer, union organizer, undocumented workers organizer ... At this point you are a 'made' Democrat. Able to leap tall buildings and become a tenured professor at practically any American University or 'elected' leader of any Union...law degree or journalism degree a plus! 'President' really shouldn't even have been in the cards ... perhaps he listened to the wrong Gypsy in a Block party one night after Blow.
Have you seen the garbage regularly elected by the citizens here in the People's Republic of New York? The philosophy is anything but the person best for the job...unless the job is being a leftist who wants to exponentially expand government, disarm the country, and strangle people and businesses with taxes and regulation.
He is the most liberal Senator, but that’s like saying the “most chaste prostitute.” Though the Democrats have the majority, there aren’t very many liberal Democrats in the Senate.
I found this - it’s pretty interesting to read.
http://www.nationaljournal.com/voteratings/sen/lib.htm?o1=lib_composite&o2=asc#vr