Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putnam Fund closes after investors pull cash[$12 Bil. Money Market Fund]
AP ^ | 18 Sep 2008 | Mark Jewell

Posted on 09/19/2008 7:11:10 AM PDT by BGHater

Putnam money-market fund suddenly closes after institutional investors pull cash

Putnam Investments on Thursday suddenly closed a $12 billion money-market fund and announced plans to return investors' money after institutional clients pulled out cash despite the fund's lack of exposure to troubled financial firms such as Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

The move, believed to be unprecedented in the nearly $3.4 trillion money-market fund industry, came a day after asset managers sought to reassure investors in the wake of a massive pullout from large retail fund Reserve Primary Fund. The run on that fund caused its assets to plunge in value by nearly two-thirds and fall below $1 for each dollar invested, exposing investors to losses of 3 cents on the dollar.

While Boston-based Putnam said its Prime Money Market Fund continued to hold $1 in assets per dollar share as of Tuesday, it "experienced significant redemption pressure" on Wednesday.

The firm's trustees voted to close the fund and distribute all assets to investors as quickly as possible -- an action Putnam said was "not related to the portfolio's credit quality, but was instead a reaction to marketwide liquidity issues."

When a fund suffers a sudden rush of orders to pull out money, fund managers must sell assets -- typically at a loss when it must be done quickly, and especially amid this week's market turmoil.

On Wednesday alone, investors pulled more than $89 billion from money-market mutual funds, according to data from iMoneyNet, publisher of the newsletter Money Fund Report. Combined with an additional $80 billion removed in the five preceding business days, total fund assets shrank nearly 5 percent from Sept. 10 to Wednesday, when the total stood at $3.35 trillion -- the biggest weekly drop since iMoneyNet began tracking such data in 1975.

(Excerpt) Read more at biz.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: business; economy; fund; housingbubble; putnam

1 posted on 09/19/2008 7:11:10 AM PDT by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Uh oh, that’s where the state pension fund is.


2 posted on 09/19/2008 7:14:37 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

“You’re thinking of this place all wrong. As if I had the money back in a safe. The money’s not here. Your money’s in Joe’s house...right next to yours. And in the Kennedy house, and Mrs. Macklin’s house, and a hundred others. Why, you’re lending them the money to build, and then, they’re going to pay it back to you as best they can. Now what are you going to do? Foreclose on them?...Now wait...now listen...now listen to me. I beg of you not to do this thing. If Potter gets hold of this Building and Loan there’ll never be another decent house built in this town. He’s already got charge of the bank. He’s got the bus line. He’s got the department stores. And now he’s after us. Why? Well, it’s very simple. Because we’re cutting in on his business, that’s why. And because he wants to keep you living in his slums and paying the kind of rent he decides. Joe, you lived in one of those Potter houses, didn’t you? Well, have you forgotten? Have you forgotten what he charged you for that broken-down shack? Here, Ed. You know, you remember last year when things weren’t going so well, and you couldn’t make your payments? You didn’t lose your house, did you? Do you think Potter would have let you keep it? Can’t you understand what’s happening here? Don’t you see what’s happening? Potter isn’t selling. Potter’s buying! And why? Because we’re panicky and he’s not. That’s why. He’s picking up some bargains. Now, we can get through this thing all right. We’ve got to stick together, though. We’ve got to have faith in each other. “


3 posted on 09/19/2008 7:16:16 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Michelle, spare me your phony outrage, you know as well as I do that dress makes your butt look big)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

It’s a Wonderful Life. My favorite movie. Jimmy Stewart


4 posted on 09/19/2008 7:18:10 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

This was an institutional MM Fund and did not take deposits from individuals. The minimum deposit was 10 million dollars. It turns out the fund had zero exposure to Lehman or AIG but somehow the word was spread it did. No one lost anyhting here as the fund did not “break the box”. The per share value remains at $1.00 per share.


5 posted on 09/19/2008 7:18:20 AM PDT by 101voodoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 101voodoo

“somehow the word was spread it did”

I think it’s time we started asking who triggered this claim and how this triggering event occurred. When did the rumor appear and who started it? What is the original event/trigger?


6 posted on 09/19/2008 7:25:08 AM PDT by combat_boots (God, gun and babies. Justices, taxes and sovereignty. Otherwise known as White Trash. Count me in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Correlate this with the announcement by Paulson that any publicly-offered money market fund will be guaranteed. The gov’t entered the market for this service and thus none of the free-market competition can compete.


7 posted on 09/19/2008 7:37:59 AM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Putnam sucks and blows... my former company’s 401(k) was managed by them... one of their offerings “New Opportunity” fund was a joke... lost something like 50% of its value in ~2001... I doubt it has ever regained (I haven’t looked)... thankfully my company switched to Fidelity (wished it would have been Vanguard... I’m a big fan of low cost index funds).


8 posted on 09/19/2008 7:39:52 AM PDT by Trajan88 (www.bullittclub.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

I can’t imagine why anyone would do this out of any attempt to profit because as a money fund it cannot be bought or sold like a stock and it cannot be shorted.

It’s possible it was just something someone heard and passed to another and with the tensions in the market today it took on a life of its own.


9 posted on 09/19/2008 8:08:26 AM PDT by 101voodoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Trajan88

In 2000 the New Opportunity fund was the “fund of the decade” according to the financial press, if I remember right. The old axiom “past performance no guarantee of future results” certainly applies. Especially to a tech heavy fund in 2000-2002. Some lost more than 70%.


10 posted on 09/19/2008 8:10:51 AM PDT by jdsteel (Palin has more experience, and class, than Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Great speech by Jimmy Stewart, in one of my all-time favorite movies. I haven’t googled this to make sure, but didn’t the guy he was talking to take his money out anyway?


11 posted on 09/19/2008 8:14:30 AM PDT by NewMexLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

“Could I have $17.50?” :-)


12 posted on 09/19/2008 8:17:50 AM PDT by Abigail Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jdsteel

That brings back memories . . . We lost about 40%.


13 posted on 09/19/2008 8:19:35 AM PDT by Abigail Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson