Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress, Bush team agree on bailout terms (Rep. Barney Frank says great deal of progress made)
AP on Yahoo ^ | 9/22/08 | Julie Hirschfeld Davis - ap

Posted on 09/22/2008 12:47:29 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON – A key Democrat negotiating a $700 billion financial bailout says the Bush administration has agreed to include mortgage aid and strong congressional oversight in the plan.

Rep. Barney Frank, the Financial Services Committee chairman, says a great deal of progress has been made ...

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 110th; bailout; barneyfrank; bush; congress; countrywide; cultureofcorruption; dodd; economicpolicy; financialcrisis; govwatch; housingbubble; terms
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: marken_ssa
Paulson says this must be done by Friday, something stinks. $700 billion, isn’t that larger than the entire military budget?

Please understand, the $700 Billion is a "rolling" amount. What do I mean by this?

This bill will give Paulson complete dictatorial power to "buy" whatever financial debt he wants to. This debt will be split into $50 Billion dollar "tranches" (i.e. pots of money). These tranches will then be sold to the bond market as AAA rated securities backed by the U.S. government (a.k.a. taxpayer). Once a tranche is sold then Paulson can buy MORE debt and still be within the $700 Billion dollar limit.

In short, what I'm trying to say is Paulson can run the 4 to 5 TRILLION of toxic waste in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac through the $700 Billion bailout plan!

The idiots in the media don't even know enough to explain this to the public!

21 posted on 09/22/2008 1:10:58 PM PDT by politicket (Palin-tology: (n) - The science of kicking Barack Obambi's butt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: NormsRevenge
They want judges to rewrite mortgage terms in bankruptcy. If that passes interest rates will skyrocket on homes.
23 posted on 09/22/2008 1:16:59 PM PDT by Conservative Actuary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Bush is a Sellout, POS dirtbag.

Barney Frank is one of the reasons this is happening.

The Socialists, BUSH included have just nationalized 3 businesses.

The United States of Socialist America, (USSA)


24 posted on 09/22/2008 1:23:27 PM PDT by stockpirate (Bitter white trash clinging to God and guns. Sarah Barracuda - the trilla from Willsila)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
We are now officially the Banana Republic of America. When the markets run out of money, when debt spirals, when the government has to print trillions of dollars more to bailout the economy, I'd say we've now become honorary members of the third world.

Add to that the fact that gas is now in very short supply down here in the south and you can't help but get this surreal feeling that you've suddenly been transported to Argentina or Zimbabwe.

Who among us would have believed in the Spring that by the Fall, all the major Wall St investment banks would be either bought out, bankrupt or restructured or some combination of the above? The whole thing is unreal.....but real.

25 posted on 09/22/2008 1:27:08 PM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Not good — not good.


26 posted on 09/22/2008 1:51:13 PM PDT by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: politicket

Politicket: I didn’t see any of this in my copy of “Finance for Dummies”.
What happens next, and when? Weimar Republic inflation? A national sales tax? Carter era interest rates? Our children hating us in ten years? Cats and dogs living together in sin.....? You sound like you know what you’re talking about and all I know for sure is that when “Butch” Frank approves, there’s a problem.


27 posted on 09/22/2008 1:51:22 PM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bushfamfan

“Bush just needs to go away.”

Sadly both of his potential replacements are liberals too. McCain is a moderate liberal and Obama is a flaming liberal. We don’t have a conservative party anymore and have not for a long time.


28 posted on 09/22/2008 1:58:35 PM PDT by DemonDeac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15
Bush caves in again

What is Bush caving on that he should not?

29 posted on 09/22/2008 2:06:21 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tempest

If a foreign investor makes an investment that makes money, they’ll pay cap gains on the increase in value under current law.

Businesses tend to invest in themselves in order to keep growing, which would create jobs.


30 posted on 09/22/2008 2:13:25 PM PDT by stylin_geek (Liberalism: comparable to a chicken with its head cut off, but with more spastic motions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bushfamfan
No bailouts for crooks!
31 posted on 09/22/2008 2:38:19 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

when Barney Frank says:

“strong congressional oversight”,

what is really meant is:

“strong congressional political tinkering, to go on forever after, with who benefits and who loses, to the detriment of the taxpayers, to the enrichment of members of Congress and the interests their tinkering will benefit”


32 posted on 09/22/2008 2:52:10 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice
What happens next, and when?

It's kind of a tricky one to figure out, now that the federal government has shown their absolute willingness to nationalize private companies en masse.

I do know that their bailout plan will not work - they're telling the American public that they will fix a problem that is not even the main problem. Everyone is focused on the mortgage industry, and it is just the fuse that set off the dynamite. The dynamite is the derivatives market. It's an extremely complex, completely unregulated market that is somewhat difficult to expain on a message forum in its entirety. The easiest way to describe it is: "Las Vegas on massive amounts of steroids - to the point of $750 trillion dollars worth of bets with "notional" dollars (i.e. pretend money)".

The derivates market is beginning to unwind. It is an international market and it will bring down the economies of the entire world with it. That is why you see Bush, Bernanke, and Paulson so terrified. That is also why you see them pushing for immediate passage of a bill that gives the Treasury Secretary (Paulson) complete dictatorial powers in the financial sector with no limit on dollars and no fear of reprisal from our legal system. It's insane.

33 posted on 09/22/2008 2:55:23 PM PDT by politicket (Palin-tology: (n) - The science of kicking Barack Obambi's butt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: politicket

‘will bring down the economies of the entire world ‘

We are hearing this a lot, any counter opinions?


34 posted on 09/22/2008 3:06:20 PM PDT by marken_ssa (The thief comes only to steal, rob and destroy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: marken_ssa
We are hearing this a lot, any counter opinions?

There are always counter-opinions, and I really like to hear them because my opinion is not exactly a rosy picture.

On a side note, I went to my bank today and withdrew some cash so that I could have more cash on hand if something were to happen to the banks. I didn't even take out that much ($2,500); however, when the teller was counting it for me his hands were shaking badly. I honestly don't know why that was.

35 posted on 09/22/2008 3:13:56 PM PDT by politicket (Palin-tology: (n) - The science of kicking Barack Obambi's butt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: politicket

I haven’t heard any counter opinions, I see this action being driven by fear so I’m just pausing for a minute and asking questions.


36 posted on 09/22/2008 3:24:20 PM PDT by marken_ssa (The thief comes only to steal, rob and destroy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: marken_ssa; politicket
Well if it's fear driving the market, you can look for a MASSIVE sell off in stocks as people try to get out of the market SOONEST and everyone tries to be the one who gets the last chair open.

And when stocks dump, gold goes the other direction so gold will skyrocket.

37 posted on 09/22/2008 4:34:16 PM PDT by HeartlandOfAmerica (Don't blame me - I voted for Fred and am STILL a FredHead and will write him in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: HeartlandOfAmerica
Well if it's fear driving the market, you can look for a MASSIVE sell off in stocks as people try to get out of the market SOONEST and everyone tries to be the one who gets the last chair open.

People need to realize that we entered "Great Depression II™" for a short while last Thursday.

The 3-month Treasury Bills were actually yielding a NEGATIVE amount (meaning people were willing to pay the government - just to have their money somewhere "safe"!)

It was weird when I went to the bank today - I wanted to withdraw some cash so that I could maintain a larger "cash-on-hand". It wasn't that much money ($2,500), but the teller's hands were shaking badly as he was counting it out for me. I'm not quite sure why, but it made me uneasy.

38 posted on 09/22/2008 5:02:53 PM PDT by politicket (Palin-tology: (n) - The science of kicking Barack Obambi's butt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: marken_ssa
Here's another piece of amateurish precognition:

Money market funds suffer huge outflows

Money market funds in the US suffered an estimated $197bn of net outflows last week as confidence in their safe-haven status weakened after one fund “broke the buck” and others closed.

Lots more of these out there.

39 posted on 09/22/2008 5:06:17 PM PDT by HeartlandOfAmerica (Don't blame me - I voted for Fred and am STILL a FredHead and will write him in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: politicket
Institutional investors generally have reserves that they call back on. Individuals don't and get skittish very easily.

If they see their 401K or the money they borrowed from their equity line of credit going south, watch the stampede.

40 posted on 09/22/2008 5:17:44 PM PDT by HeartlandOfAmerica (Don't blame me - I voted for Fred and am STILL a FredHead and will write him in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson