To: R. Scott
I suggest that electronics systems in 1962 were far different than today’s. Extrapolating 46-years old data based on ancient systems is not sound scientifically. While I’m sure there are theoretical reasons to worry about EMP, I would be cautious in accepting them based on data at hand.
12 posted on
10/03/2008 4:57:31 AM PDT by
astounded
(The democrat party is a clear and present danger to America)
To: astounded
I suggest that electronics systems in 1962 were far different than today’s. Extrapolating 46-years old data based on ancient systems is not sound scientifically. While I’m sure there are theoretical reasons to worry about EMP, I would be cautious in accepting them based on data at hand.
Yeah the systems in 1962 were far more ROBUST and resistant to EMP then the current microprocessors and circuits. Thats why the military has been working for years to harden their equipment to EMP.
14 posted on
10/03/2008 5:25:35 AM PDT by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: There is no god named Allah, and Muhammed is a false prophet)
To: astounded
18 posted on
10/03/2008 2:14:23 PM PDT by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson