Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Between firefights, soldiers in Afghanistan find time to vote
Canwest News Service via National Post ^ | 2008-10-04 | Tom Blackwell

Posted on 10/05/2008 5:18:42 AM PDT by Clive

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan -- The work day all but over Saturday, Bombardier Hollie Speers did what a lot of Canadians are thinking about these days: she voted in an advance poll.

Unlike the average voter, though, Bombardier Speers cast her ballot with an assault rifle slung over her shoulder, at a polling booth deep in Taliban country.

She was part of a Herculean effort to ensure that hundreds of Canadian troops in Afghanistan get a chance to exercise their democratic franchise, between firefights and reconstruction projects.

So far, the project has been a surprising success. The 75% poll turnout at Bombardier Speers' forward operating base west of Kandahar city far exceeds the usual national average.

"I felt like, ‘How could they not [set up a poll]?' " said the soldier, who helps operate a 155 mm. artillery gun. "It's a big part of why we're here, so how could they take it away from us?"

Elections Canada sent ballots for all of the 2,500 or so Canadian service people stationed in Afghanistan. About a third of them had to be shipped out to the various outposts scattered through the most volatile parts of Kandahar province. Some were even transported by helicopter to the bases.

Capt. Chris Reeves, second-in-command at Capt. Speers' base and its designated deputy returning officer, said he'd just got back from a harrowing patrol a few weeks ago -- where he and his men came under fire from insurgents -- to find a package addressed to him from Elections Canada.

It explained, among other points, that he was to allow representatives of the political parties to observe the polling if they applied. As it turned out, "none of the parties showed up," Capt. Reeves said with a grin, as shots rang out from a nearby rifle range.

...

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalpost.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2008; absenteevote; afghanistan; canadiantroops; militaryvote

1 posted on 10/05/2008 5:18:43 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: exg; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; Cannoneer No. 4; ...

-


2 posted on 10/05/2008 5:19:20 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Good to know. Thanks.


3 posted on 10/05/2008 5:36:27 AM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Too bad that the Rats have agents in the Post Office that throw them away.


4 posted on 10/05/2008 5:40:33 AM PDT by Seruzawa (American Government: Providing Middle Class Incomes to Unemployables for Over 200 Years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa
You may be referring problem that arose in the last US general election wherein military ballots were rejected on the grounds that they arrived by military courier instead of by post.

The Canadian rules do not require that the ballots' envelopes be postmarked. Elections Canada does not have any requirement that the ballots arrive by post. The main requirement is that they be in sealed official, bar coded, outer envelopes with the ballot in an official inner envelope, all part of a kit supplied by Elections Canada.

It does not matter how the envelopes get to Canada. These ballots will no doubt be added to the manifest of a returning C17 or C130 from Kandahar to CFB Trenton then by surface courier to Ottawa.

See this backgrounder by Elections Canada:

VOTING BY SPECIAL BALLOT FOR CANADIAN FORCES ELECTORS

5 posted on 10/05/2008 6:05:03 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Unlike their counterparts in America who’s votes don’t count.


6 posted on 10/05/2008 6:12:47 AM PDT by itsthejourney (Sarah-cuda IS the right reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive; GMMAC; exg; kanawa; backhoe; -YYZ-; Former Proud Canadian; Squawk 8888; headsonpikes; ...

7 posted on 10/05/2008 6:13:24 AM PDT by fanfan (SCC:Canadians have constitutional protection to all opinions, as long as they are based on the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clive

The RATSmay try to bar the counting of them, just for practice, a knee-jerk reaction. They hate anybodys’ military.


8 posted on 10/05/2008 6:16:13 AM PDT by Waco ( G00d bye 0'bomber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson