Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Read What Californians Are Saying to Hallmark About Their "same-sex couple" Cards
Family Policy Network ^ | 10/7/08 | Family Policy Network

Posted on 10/07/2008 4:41:00 AM PDT by TheAverageGuy

[FPN - 10/7/08] - Many citizens throughout California (see their comments below) have joined a nationwide boycott against Hallmark Incorporated, in response to that company's introduction of so-called "same-sex couple" greeting cards. The boycott, which was announced in August by Family Policy Network, has begun to attract supporters in cities and towns throughout the nation.

The text of the Boycott Hallmark petition reads as follows:

To: Hallmark Cards CEO Donald J. Hall

In Isaiah 5:20, God warns against exchanging good for evil by saying, "Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!" (NKJV)

In Mark 10:6-8, God’s design for marriage is expressed clearly by Jesus Christ, when He declares, "But from the beginning of the creation, God ‘made them male and female.’ For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh; so then they are no longer two, but one flesh." (NKJV)

I urge you to withdraw any and all products sold by your company that celebrate, condone or otherwise encourage homosexual conduct and/or relationships. Unless and until you do, you have my pledge that I will refrain from doing business with your company.

Many Californians who signed the petition to boycott Hallmark added their own comments to the statement above. Here is a sampling of those comments:


TAKE ACTION:

By signing Family Policy Network's SECURE petition, your name and contact data will be compiled with many others from all over the United States who are opposed Hallmark's pro-homosexual cards. The list will be forwarded to Hallmark Chairman Donald J. Hall along with the verses above and an admonition to stop endorsing homosexual immorality.

To sign this petition now, click here: 
http://familypolicynetwork.net/petitions/fpn/hallmark/

Thank you for your support. Let's pray together for Hallmark to do the right thing and pull these cards from their shelves.


RELATED LINKS:

Family Policy Network: http://familypolicy.net/

FPN's Homosexual Ministry Outreach: http://hopeforhomosexuals.com/

FPN Leader Defends the Need for Federal Marriage Amendment on CNN: http://familypolicy.net/43wrongs/?p=473


Family Policy Network (FPN) is an independent, national, 501(c)(3) non-profit organization with board members and advisors in Georgia, Illinois, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, Ohio, Virginia and Tennessee. The group has supporters and participants in every state in the nation.


TOPICS: Announcements; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; gaymarriage; gays; hallmark; homomark; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; moralabsolutes; queernation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
If you haven't already signed the Boycott Hallmark petition, you can do so at http://boycotthallmark.com/.
1 posted on 10/07/2008 4:41:01 AM PDT by TheAverageGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TheAverageGuy

Hallmark: “When you care enough to send the very best.”

Yeah, right.


2 posted on 10/07/2008 4:52:31 AM PDT by shove_it (and have a nice day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheAverageGuy

I quit buying Hallmark products years ago when I learned that their company policies are anti 2A. As I recall, they fired some worker who came to work with his shotgun in his truck during hunting season—or something silly like that.


3 posted on 10/07/2008 4:54:23 AM PDT by basil (Support the Second Amendment-buy another gun today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheAverageGuy

Do the cards mention marriage at all or is it congratulations on your special day? I am against gay marriage but if someone wants to by a card for a gay couple I have no issue with that. I think the story needs more details. For example if the card says “Congratulations on your Wedding Day” or “Matrimony is a special event” then I would be outraged, but if it says “I hope you two have a wonderful life together” or “A day you come together” would not be as bad. What is it?


4 posted on 10/07/2008 4:55:35 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheAverageGuy

You have to watch out, because many grocery stores sell Ambassador Cards, which is a part of Hallmark.


5 posted on 10/07/2008 4:56:31 AM PDT by arichtaxpayer (We will not tire, we will not falter, and we will not fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil

I quit buying Hallmark when they hired Maya Angelou.

Blech.


6 posted on 10/07/2008 4:56:44 AM PDT by Carley (she's all out of caribou.............but does have a bracelet!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
With respect, I disagree with your stance. I would never offer any gesture that showed agreement or acceptance of any homosexual relationship.

I do not believe this is good for America. In spite of what the popular media tells us, homosexual behavior is a destructive lifestyle. It destroys lives and relationships and contributes to the deterioration of our culture. It is not an innocuous, "nobody hurts anybody" lifestyle.

As a Christian, I love homosexuals. I count several of them among my friends and acquaintances. I want the best for them and that is why I do not endorse or encourage their self-destructive behavior.

7 posted on 10/07/2008 5:17:01 AM PDT by Drawsing (The fool shows his annoyance at once. The prudent man overlooks an insult. (Proverbs 12:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheAverageGuy

Has Hallmark come out with its special “AIDS bereavement” line of cards yet?

That may sound harsh, but state promotion of a behavior that is an unusually good method of transmitting an incurable, fatal disease doesn’t sound like a great idea to me.

If the government applied this “logic” to smoking then lighting up would be considered a fundamental constitutional right.


8 posted on 10/07/2008 5:23:50 AM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: TheAverageGuy

I’m a Libertarian, and I never criticize consenting adults for doing the things that make happy. Hallmark is a capitalist company and is catering to an unmet niche market in the greeding card market. They should be praised, not criticized, for creating products that people want to buy. This is supposed to be a capitalist country.


11 posted on 10/07/2008 6:09:47 AM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheAverageGuy

Hey, I’m all for using biblical passages for

teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness
(2 Timothy 3:16)

But to non-believers, those who don’t recognize biblical authority, it’s meaningless.


12 posted on 10/07/2008 6:12:41 AM PDT by MrB (0bama supporters: What's the attraction? The Marxism or the Infanticide?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

You are right this is a capitalist country. But we do have the right to call Hallmark on the carpet for stooping to such a low level. It’s called Freedom of Speech. Hallmark has done nothing commendable.


13 posted on 10/07/2008 6:16:51 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: TheAverageGuy; All

I signed the petition.
That reminds me that I’m still boycotting Slim Fast because of Whoopie Goldberg’s rant against President Bush a few years ago.
The interesting thing is, at that time I looked for alternative products to replace Slim Fast and found better ones anyhow.
These corporations don’t realize what damage they do to themselves.

I’m also cancelling my subscription to a magazine called “MORE”. It’s for women over 40 (smiles).
They put Michelle Obama on the cover for the October issue complete with a gushing article.
But neither Cindy McCain nor Sarah Palin got equal billing.

You should have seen the backlash of comments on their website. I would say 85%-90% thought the same way I did. If that is any indication of how the election will go, we all can be encouraged.


15 posted on 10/07/2008 6:40:34 AM PDT by CaraM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Well, then you must fully support individuals’ right to choose what they support with their own money, rather than make a law to make their point.


16 posted on 10/07/2008 9:44:50 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (The LA Times, 10/6/08, was told to cut "75 editorial positions." How many are needed for 2 pages?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: grundle
I’m a Libertarian, and I never criticize consenting adults for doing the things that make happy.

Ted Bundy was happy before he got caught. So I guess criticism of him is wrong.

They should be praised, not criticized, for creating products that people want to buy. This is supposed to be a capitalist country.

Since when should capitalism come without a moral structure?

18 posted on 10/07/2008 10:19:28 AM PDT by bcsco (Palin started her political career in a small town, Obama from the house of a domestic terrorist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: grundle
This is supposed to be a capitalist country.

If that's the case, they should also serve the pedophile and coprophagia communities. Get real. It's a road apple they didn't have to step into, but chose to simply for a buck. Is money the highest value our society should uphold?

19 posted on 10/07/2008 10:26:04 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (The Word of God is powerful. That's why so many people are afraid to read it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MrB
to non-believers, those who don’t recognize biblical authority, it’s meaningless.

One of the respondents said he or she is an atheist, but nevertheless agrees in principle that marriage should be between one man and one woman.

20 posted on 10/07/2008 10:27:34 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (The Word of God is powerful. That's why so many people are afraid to read it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson